European Association for Public Administration Accreditation


NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN www.unpan.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

October 11 - October 12, 2022
How to Plead Successfully Before the EU Courts

October 13 - October 19, 2022
Evaluation and Monitoring of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds Programmes

October 13 - October 19, 2022
Evaluation and Monitoring of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds Programmes

October 13 - October 14, 2022
A Practical Guide to the Infringement Procedure

October 27 - October 28, 2022
Sustainable Finance in the EU: The EU Taxonomy Regulation and the ‘Do no Significant Harm’ Principle

October 28 - October 28, 2022
EU Law Resources on the Web

November 7 - November 10, 2022
Everything You Wanted to Know About the European Green Deal 2021–2027

November 8 - November 9, 2022
Introduction to EU Asylum and Migration Law

November 14 - November 15, 2022
Recent Developments in European Public Procurement and Case Law

November 24 - November 25, 2022
European Union Civil Service Law

  view more...

Other NEWS

People-centred Governance in a Post-pandemic World - Report of the 2022 SDG 16 C

CEPAR new issue Vol 20 No1 (2022)

UN Public Service Day & Awards

Virtual Celebration United Nations Public Service Day 22 June 2022

The report of the 21st session of the Committee of Experts on Public Administrat

Nations in Transit 2022: From Democratic Decline to Authoritarian Aggression

SIGMA Monitoring Reports Western Balkans 2021

Call for Papers: The Transatlantic Dialog 2022- Deadline for abstracts extended

CEPAR new issue Vol 19 No2 (2021)

UNDESA Policy Briefs



A proper summing up of the programme means we must first re-stress its main goals, as formulated by the proposal:


Goal 1: Address key public policy problems in Central and Eastern Europeand the NISin order to promote social and economic development and democratization.

Goal 2: Build partnerships between higher education and government in Central and
Eastern Europeand the NISas a means of strengthening government problem-solving and civic capacity.

Goal 3: Support the further development of public administration education in Central and
Eastern Europeand the NISin an effort to train new generations of public sector leaders, informed by international developments in public administration.

Goal 4: Leverage local capacity provided by NISPAcee by forming
a sustainable partnership and building on past
USsupport to Central and Eastern Europefor meeting mutual development objectives in the region.

Goal 5: Engage US universities in a new generation of development partnerships.


The analysis in previous parts of the evaluation, and details provided by annexes fully prove that the programme fulfilled all its goals. Many important public policy problems were included in projects; these included training and its quality, leaderships, auditing, health care delivery, human resources management, policy-making skills, public financial management, advisory capacities and strategic management.


Pre-conditions for awarding the project included letters of endorsement by respective government levels and a willingness to cooperate with academic and training institutions in CEE. In spite of the fact that the same quality of cooperation with government was not achieved, the programme contributed significantly to the building of partnerships and, in some cases, functioning as the starting impulse for joint activities which will continue after the programme is finished. This issue is important for all CEE counties, and in some of them the creation of cooperation represents an important tool with which to cope with the old-fashioned behavior of public officials.


There is no doubt the programme strengthened the institutional capacity of all participating CEE academic and training institutions. New courses and curricula were developed, and books, textbooks, research protocols and training manuals published. Many participants gained additional educational, training, research and cooperative skills.


The position of NISPAcee in the region was strengthened. The project contributed to what had already been achieved in the region via a comprehensive set of its activities, supported by key international players including major US contributions provided by USAID, Pew trust, OSI and many other donors.


The programme was also an important step forward from the point of view of the engagement of US universities in CEE in a new way, adopting to the changing situation in the CEE region. (Some of recipient countries, for example, are already EU members, and shall be handled accordingly.) A one-way channel was replaced by an open trajectory; it included important flows coming from all connected points: west to east and east to west, but also from east to east. 


Taking all this into the account, our suggestion is to evaluate the Joint NASPAA–NISPAcee Project “The Cooperative Governance Improvement and Technical Assistance project” as successful.