EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN www.unpan.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

February 21 - February 22, 2019
KAYFOR 16

March 3 - March 8, 2019
EUROPEANS SHARING VIEWS

March 12 - March 13, 2019
Better Budgets for Better Horizon 2020 Proposals — What to Do and How to Do it

March 12 - March 13, 2019
Better Budgets for Better Horizon 2020 Proposals — What to Do and How to Do it

March 13 - March 14, 2019
Breaking Silos for Better Service Delivery: How to Build Sustained Partnerships between the Public S

March 19 - March 20, 2019
The New Regulations for EU Structural Funds programmes 2021-2027: The new OMNIBUS regulation

March 25 - March 26, 2019
Free Movement of Persons

March 25 - March 27, 2019
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) of EU-Financed Projects: Why and How? — CBA Guide 2014-2020 and its Futu

March 26 - March 27, 2019
Workshop: The Procurement Cycle and Practice

March 26 - March 29, 2019
Understanding EU Decision-Making: Principles, Procedures, Practice (+ preliminary module)

  view more...

Other NEWS

Public Sector Leadership and Capability – OECD Recommendation adopted!

Strategic Human Resources Management: data available!

Draft Declaration on Public Sector Innovation - Webinar

Recommendation of the Council on OECD Legal Instruments

Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” - Call for papers 15.3.2019

Central European Public Administration Review

UNPAN Newsletter October 2018

KAYFOR - Call for Papers 1.10.2018

International project SLIHE at Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica

Working Group on Ethics in Governance

This working group does not exist any more.

Outline
 
The Working Group on Ethics in Governance, which was announced at the 12th NISPAcee conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, in May 2004, succeeded the Working Group on Preventing Corruption in Public Administration.
 
Background and justification
 
Administrative malpractice, such as corruption, abuse of power, and favoritism, are widespread in the public sector, including CEE countries. At the same time corruption and ethics have become important issues in the practice and theory of politics, public administration, law, economics and society. This has led to more awareness and knowledge of the ethical or moral dimension of politics and administration and the causes of and solutions for ethical dilemmas in administrative decision-making.

Although rules and regulations are required to address such malpractice, ethical approaches are needed as well.  Bottom-up initiatives must complement top-down activities. 

The Working Group on Ethics in Governance brought together academics and practitioners interested in the ethical dimension of administrative decision-making. The group's mission was to establish a long-term network aimed at stimulating research on public service charters in CEE countries and Balkans, including questions concerning principles and standards of discretional power, neutrality and legality, transparency and administrative responsiveness to the regime in office. The Working Group on Ethics in Governance had an important opportunity to take advantage of the momentum and fluidity in the transition countries, and perhaps even to exercise some leadership in the development and implementation of new directions in administrative ethics.

The Working Group had its meeting at the 2005 NISPAcee Annual Conference, in Moscow. The aim of the sessions was to present an overview of CEE experience on ethics in governance with relevance for the practice of CEE governance and government.
 
Therefore, the Working Group on Ethics in Governance had identified as its first priorities the distinction between the legal and the ethical, administrative decision making, the exercise of discretion, political-administrative relations, and civil servants and their external environment, including interest groups, citizens, and civil society in the CEE region.
 
Papers on the following four topics were invited.

1. National decision-making systems: what helps nations to improve their ethical decision-making process and to curb corruption?
2. What are rules to exercise the discretion powers?
3. What are national and organizational rules to prevent malpractices?
4. The role of NGO’s, media and civil society in preventing and detecting wrongdoing.
 
Conclusions from the meeting 2005:

The objectives.

During the course of the 2005 Conference in Moscow, the proposal to reformulate Working Group IX, was considered by those participating in the Working Group. The group was convened by Dr Patrycja Suwaj (Bialystok Business School) and Mr Howard Whitton (OECD SIGMA program).

 
 

The Working Group discussed possible foci for future work in the context of NISPAcee’s mandate, and agreed to recommend to the Secretariat that it be redesignated under the title"Integrity in Public Governance”. Those present also resolved to seek to extend the membership of the group, so as to build connections between reflective practitioners and engaged scholars in the Ethics/Integrity field, as a matter of priority.

 
 

The primary objective of the Group was to enrich the 2006 Conference program with significant theory and practice papers, and other presentations focused on any aspect of the field of Ethics/Integrityin Public Governance. Cross-disciplinary studies are to be encouraged. 

NISPAcee Press

  NISPAcee eNewsletter

Archive

RECENT JOURNAL

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Public Administration for Well-being and Growth

NISPAcee

   Price: 0 € Order

Efficiency in Local Service Delivery (English)

Juraj Nemec

   Price: 0 € Order

  1 2 3 4 5 of 73 

On-line payments

VISAMastercard
mastercardMaestroVISAVISA ElectronDiners club