EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN www.unpan.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

October 28 - October 28, 2021
Making European Policies Work – Next Generation EIPA

November 2 - November 9, 2021
Cohesion Policy Project Appraisal 2021-2027, CBA, the Connecting Europe Facility

November 9 - November 10, 2021
How to Work with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office?

November 10 - November 12, 2021
Performance Auditing of EU Co-Funded Investments

November 15 - November 19, 2021
The Green Deal 2021-2027

November 16 - November 17, 2021
Challenges Posed by Technological Disruption, Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence

November 18 - November 19, 2021
Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures

November 18 - November 19, 2021
Introduction to EU Asylum and Migration Law

November 23 - November 25, 2021
The New Regulations for Financial Management and Control of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds

November 24 - November 26, 2021
Audit and Anti-Fraud Measures, ESI Funds 2021-2027 ARACHNE Programme

  view more...

Other NEWS

World Public Sector Report 2021

Call for papers for the TRAS special issue

Call for Papers: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences

CEPAR: SPECIAL ISSUE CALL for 1-2021

ASPA: Call for Papers – Occasional Paper Series

TRAS: Public Administration’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic

Think fast …act faster

Call for Papers - Smart City and Regional Development Journal

Participation in Public Administration Revisited

OECD Senior Vacancy Position: Senior Policy Advisor

Working Group on Ethics in Governance

This working group does not exist any more.

Outline
 
The Working Group on Ethics in Governance, which was announced at the 12th NISPAcee conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, in May 2004, succeeded the Working Group on Preventing Corruption in Public Administration.
 
Background and justification
 
Administrative malpractice, such as corruption, abuse of power, and favoritism, are widespread in the public sector, including CEE countries. At the same time corruption and ethics have become important issues in the practice and theory of politics, public administration, law, economics and society. This has led to more awareness and knowledge of the ethical or moral dimension of politics and administration and the causes of and solutions for ethical dilemmas in administrative decision-making.

Although rules and regulations are required to address such malpractice, ethical approaches are needed as well.  Bottom-up initiatives must complement top-down activities. 

The Working Group on Ethics in Governance brought together academics and practitioners interested in the ethical dimension of administrative decision-making. The group's mission was to establish a long-term network aimed at stimulating research on public service charters in CEE countries and Balkans, including questions concerning principles and standards of discretional power, neutrality and legality, transparency and administrative responsiveness to the regime in office. The Working Group on Ethics in Governance had an important opportunity to take advantage of the momentum and fluidity in the transition countries, and perhaps even to exercise some leadership in the development and implementation of new directions in administrative ethics.

The Working Group had its meeting at the 2005 NISPAcee Annual Conference, in Moscow. The aim of the sessions was to present an overview of CEE experience on ethics in governance with relevance for the practice of CEE governance and government.
 
Therefore, the Working Group on Ethics in Governance had identified as its first priorities the distinction between the legal and the ethical, administrative decision making, the exercise of discretion, political-administrative relations, and civil servants and their external environment, including interest groups, citizens, and civil society in the CEE region.
 
Papers on the following four topics were invited.

1. National decision-making systems: what helps nations to improve their ethical decision-making process and to curb corruption?
2. What are rules to exercise the discretion powers?
3. What are national and organizational rules to prevent malpractices?
4. The role of NGO’s, media and civil society in preventing and detecting wrongdoing.
 
Conclusions from the meeting 2005:

The objectives.

During the course of the 2005 Conference in Moscow, the proposal to reformulate Working Group IX, was considered by those participating in the Working Group. The group was convened by Dr Patrycja Suwaj (Bialystok Business School) and Mr Howard Whitton (OECD SIGMA program).

 
 

The Working Group discussed possible foci for future work in the context of NISPAcee’s mandate, and agreed to recommend to the Secretariat that it be redesignated under the title"Integrity in Public Governance”. Those present also resolved to seek to extend the membership of the group, so as to build connections between reflective practitioners and engaged scholars in the Ethics/Integrity field, as a matter of priority.

 
 

The primary objective of the Group was to enrich the 2006 Conference program with significant theory and practice papers, and other presentations focused on any aspect of the field of Ethics/Integrityin Public Governance. Cross-disciplinary studies are to be encouraged. 

NISPAcee Press

  NISPAcee eNewsletter

Archive

RECENT JOURNAL

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Public Administration Education Quality Enhancement in the EU’s New Member States

Éva Kovács, David Špaček, Primož Pevcin, Ľudmila Gajdošová

   Price: 0 € Order

Methodological Framework for Developing Public Administration Curricula in Conformity with European Quality

Juraj Nemec, David Špaček, Daniel Klimovský

   Price: 0 € Order

  1 2 3 4 5 of 82 

On-line payments

VISAMastercard
mastercardMaestroVISAVISA ElectronDiners club