EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN www.unpan.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

March 14 - March 15, 2018
2nd International Education and Career Exhibition

March 21 - March 22, 2018
Implementing the European Structural and Investment Funds Regulations, 2014-2020

March 21 - March 22, 2018
Learn How To Master Theory-Based Impact Evaluation

March 22 - March 23, 2018
2018 AAPA Annual Conference

April 23 - April 25, 2018
Workplace Innovation: The Essential Fifth Element Diagnostic and Beyond

April 24 - April 25, 2018
European Public Procurement, PPP/Private Finance and Concessions

May 2 - May 4, 2018
Economics of Digital Transformation (EDT) 2018 DIGITOMICS

May 16 - May 17, 2018
Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures Master Class

May 21 - May 25, 2018
ICT and free Web Tools in Education: Another way to Teach and to Learn

May 30 - May 31, 2018
International Conference in Public Administration and Territorial Development at the Baikal lakeside

  view more...

Other NEWS

University of Ljubljana: Workshop on the Role of Public Administration

Hertie School of Governance: Call for applications for the Scholarship 15.3.18

International project SLIHE at Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica

A new issue of International Public Administration Review published

Modernization, Westernization and Democratization of Public Financial Management

IASIA Call for papers 28.2.2018

Journal "Policy Design and Practice"

2018 AAPA Annual Conference: Call for papers 27.11.2017

Working Group on Ethics in Governance

This working group does not exist any more.

Outline
 
The Working Group on Ethics in Governance, which was announced at the 12th NISPAcee conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, in May 2004, succeeded the Working Group on Preventing Corruption in Public Administration.
 
Background and justification
 
Administrative malpractice, such as corruption, abuse of power, and favoritism, are widespread in the public sector, including CEE countries. At the same time corruption and ethics have become important issues in the practice and theory of politics, public administration, law, economics and society. This has led to more awareness and knowledge of the ethical or moral dimension of politics and administration and the causes of and solutions for ethical dilemmas in administrative decision-making.

Although rules and regulations are required to address such malpractice, ethical approaches are needed as well.  Bottom-up initiatives must complement top-down activities. 

The Working Group on Ethics in Governance brought together academics and practitioners interested in the ethical dimension of administrative decision-making. The group's mission was to establish a long-term network aimed at stimulating research on public service charters in CEE countries and Balkans, including questions concerning principles and standards of discretional power, neutrality and legality, transparency and administrative responsiveness to the regime in office. The Working Group on Ethics in Governance had an important opportunity to take advantage of the momentum and fluidity in the transition countries, and perhaps even to exercise some leadership in the development and implementation of new directions in administrative ethics.

The Working Group had its meeting at the 2005 NISPAcee Annual Conference, in Moscow. The aim of the sessions was to present an overview of CEE experience on ethics in governance with relevance for the practice of CEE governance and government.
 
Therefore, the Working Group on Ethics in Governance had identified as its first priorities the distinction between the legal and the ethical, administrative decision making, the exercise of discretion, political-administrative relations, and civil servants and their external environment, including interest groups, citizens, and civil society in the CEE region.
 
Papers on the following four topics were invited.

1. National decision-making systems: what helps nations to improve their ethical decision-making process and to curb corruption?
2. What are rules to exercise the discretion powers?
3. What are national and organizational rules to prevent malpractices?
4. The role of NGO’s, media and civil society in preventing and detecting wrongdoing.
 
Conclusions from the meeting 2005:

The objectives.

During the course of the 2005 Conference in Moscow, the proposal to reformulate Working Group IX, was considered by those participating in the Working Group. The group was convened by Dr Patrycja Suwaj (Bialystok Business School) and Mr Howard Whitton (OECD SIGMA program).

 
 

The Working Group discussed possible foci for future work in the context of NISPAcee’s mandate, and agreed to recommend to the Secretariat that it be redesignated under the title"Integrity in Public Governance”. Those present also resolved to seek to extend the membership of the group, so as to build connections between reflective practitioners and engaged scholars in the Ethics/Integrity field, as a matter of priority.

 
 

The primary objective of the Group was to enrich the 2006 Conference program with significant theory and practice papers, and other presentations focused on any aspect of the field of Ethics/Integrityin Public Governance. Cross-disciplinary studies are to be encouraged. 

NISPAcee Press

  NISPAcee eNewsletter

Archive

RECENT JOURNAL

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Efficiency in Local Service Delivery (Ukrainian)

Juraj Nemec

   Price: 0 € Order

Transparency, Openness, Intelligibility (Ukrainian)

Tomas Jacko

   Price: 0 € Order

  2 3 4 5 6 of 70 

On-line payments

VISAMastercard
mastercardMaestroVISAVISA ElectronDiners club