Annex 18:
2TA: Summer Institute on Public Management Reform
1. Project description
Project number |
2TA |
Project title |
Summer Institute on Public Management Reform |
Responsible institution |
Georg Sootla |
NASPAA partner |
|
NISPAcee partner |
Estonian Business |
Budget: planned |
$7,500 USD |
Budget: resources really used |
$7,500 USD |
Project period: |
1.1.2002 – 17.2.2003 |
2. Project purposes and goals
The goal of the summer institute on “Public Management Reform” was to provide a learning environment for considering the lessons learned from recent American public administration reform experiences, and their implications for
The objectives of the summer institute were defined as follows:
1. Gain an understanding of the political, economic and social context for administrative reform in the
2. Assess the results of efforts to “reinvent” public administration at the national, state, and local levels of government.
3. Identify major management issues and developments in contemporary American intergovernmental relations, especially those relating to decentralization and devolution of authority.
4. Discern trends and future directions of public administration reform in the
5. Foster linkages between higher education institutions, local governments and community and nonprofit organizations in
6. Develop information and analyses that can be made available to other NISPAcee organizations to assist their efforts to address public administration reform in their country or region.
3. Project realization
The summer institute took place over ten days of training. Morning sessions were four hours; afternoons were reserved for two-hour consultations were made via ad hoc appointments. Those 40 hours were divided into three equal modules delivered by three professors from
During the summer, institute visits to governing institutions and universities were organized for trainers who met with the Estonian Parliament, State Audit office (meeting with chief Auditor of Estonia) and the Bank of Estonia. Separate visits to
The institute was finalized with a closing session to which representatives of universities and the
Altogether 20 applications were accepted and 17 trainees successfully finished the seminar. Those trainees were from two universities (TPU, TTU) and from the
The technical assistance project went relatively well, but some problems occurred during its realization. One of the participants (
4. Project outputs, outcomes and impacts
The summer institute brought together 20 participants, providing them with comprehensive knowledge on recent public administration and management trends. After the training phase, the participants were expected to prepare and present their essays,. However, only seven of the 12 expected were prepared in time.
By publishing these essays, the summer institute achieved its general output: to develop information and analyses that can be made available to other NISPAcee organizations to assist their efforts in addressing public administration reform in their country or region via web pages, as the tangible output of the project.
The specific outcomes were the knowledge transfer to the courses delivered at the universities, and the development of institutional cooperation between