EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN unpan.un.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

May 22 - May 24, 2024
Financial Management and Audit of EU Structural Funds, 2021-2027

May 22 - May 24, 2024
CAF Success Decoded: Leadership Commitment and Agile Management

May 23 - May 28, 2024
Ex-post Regulatory Evaluations

May 23 - May 30, 2024
Regulatory Impact Assessments

June 4 - June 6, 2024
Monitoring and Evaluation of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds programmes, 2021-2027

June 18 - June 19, 2024
Negotiate to Win: Essential Skills for Bilateral Negotiations

June 26 - June 27, 2024
Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures

September 11 - September 12, 2024
ICSD 2024

November 6 - November 12, 2024
Cohesion Policy Project Appraisal 2021-2027, CBA, and Economic Appraisal

  view more...

Other NEWS

Central European Public Administration Review accepted for inclusion in Scopus

Central European Public Administration Review - new issue has been published

Call for applications for Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance MA programme

UNPAN Partners’ Newsletter July – August – September 2023

INVITATION:KosovaPAR2023 Conference on PAR for an Agile and Resilient Governance

DPIDG/DESA and the International Budget Partnership (IBP) Handbook for Auditors

CEPAR new issue Vol 21 No1 (2023)

Call for papers for EGPA 2023 Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, 5-7 September 2023

Freedom House NEW REPORT: Global Freedom Declines for 17th Consecutive Year

Call for PIONEER (Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance) application

Annex 18:

2TA: Summer Institute on Public Management Reform

 

1. Project description

 

Project number

2TA

Project title

Summer Institute on Public Management Reform

Responsible institution

Tallinn Pedagogical University, Department of Government, Public Policy and Administration, Estonia

Georg Sootla

NASPAA partner

University of Baltimore, Yale Gordon College of Liberal Arts, Carl Stenberg

NISPAcee partner

Estonian Business Scholl, Estonia, Arno Allman

Budget: planned

$7,500 USD

Budget: resources really used

$7,500 USD

Project period:

1.1.2002 – 17.2.2003

 

2.  Project purposes and goals

 

The goal of the summer institute on “Public Management Reform” was to provide a learning environment for considering the lessons learned from recent American public administration reform experiences, and their implications for Estonia and other Eastern European countries.

The objectives of the summer institute were defined as follows:

1.       Gain an understanding of the political, economic and social context for administrative reform in the United States during the 1990s.

2.       Assess the results of efforts to “reinvent” public administration at the national, state, and local levels of government.

3.       Identify major management issues and developments in contemporary American intergovernmental relations, especially those relating to decentralization and devolution of authority.

4.       Discern trends and future directions of public administration reform in the United States and Estonia.

5.       Foster linkages between higher education institutions, local governments and community and nonprofit organizations in Estonia.

6.       Develop information and analyses that can be made available to other NISPAcee organizations to assist their efforts to address public administration reform in their country or region.

 

3. Project realization

 

The summer institute took place over ten days of training. Morning sessions were four hours; afternoons were reserved for two-hour consultations were made via ad hoc appointments. Those 40 hours were divided into three equal modules delivered by three professors from University of Baltimore: Professor Carl Stenberg (“Reform in central local relations”), Professor Louis Gawthrop (“Reform of civil service and public service ethics”) and Lenneal Henderson (“Public management innovations”).

During the summer, institute visits to governing institutions and universities were organized for trainers who met with the Estonian Parliament, State Audit office (meeting with chief Auditor of Estonia) and the Bank of Estonia. Separate visits to Tartu and the Saaremaa Islands were organized for a look at local public life.

The institute was finalized with a closing session to which representatives of universities and the US embassy in Estonia were invited.  Besides the addresses presented from the institution, the general evaluation of SI was carried out.

Altogether 20 applications were accepted and 17 trainees successfully finished the seminar. Those trainees were from two universities (TPU, TTU) and from the Estonian Academy of Public Service.  They also represented four ministries (Economics, Environment, Education and Finance), two state agencies (Police; Citizenship and Migration), one county government, one local government, and two independent public institutions (The Bank of Estonia and the State Audit office).

            The technical assistance project went relatively well, but some problems occurred during its realization. One of the participants (Estonian Business School) could not take active part in the institute due to the changes in their schedule of lections. However, during the initial stage of the project Mr. Alman’s participation was of considerable importance.

 

4. Project outputs, outcomes and impacts

 

 The summer institute brought together 20 participants, providing them with comprehensive knowledge on recent public administration and management trends. After the training phase, the participants were expected to prepare and present their essays,. However, only seven of the 12 expected were prepared in time.

By publishing these essays, the summer institute achieved its general output: to develop information and analyses that can be made available to other NISPAcee organizations to assist their efforts in addressing public administration reform in their country or region via web pages, as the tangible output of the project.

            The specific outcomes were the knowledge transfer to the courses delivered at the universities, and the development of institutional cooperation between Baltimore and Estonia with the aim of developing a permanent institution of summer schools between the University of Baltimore and Estonian universities. The most important benefit for Tallinn Pedagogical University and for the Department of Government is the possibility of enlarging the research area and cooperation with partners across the ocean.