EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN unpan.un.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

May 22 - May 24, 2024
Financial Management and Audit of EU Structural Funds, 2021-2027

May 22 - May 24, 2024
CAF Success Decoded: Leadership Commitment and Agile Management

May 23 - May 28, 2024
Ex-post Regulatory Evaluations

May 23 - May 30, 2024
Regulatory Impact Assessments

June 4 - June 6, 2024
Monitoring and Evaluation of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds programmes, 2021-2027

June 18 - June 19, 2024
Negotiate to Win: Essential Skills for Bilateral Negotiations

June 26 - June 27, 2024
Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures

September 11 - September 12, 2024
ICSD 2024

November 6 - November 12, 2024
Cohesion Policy Project Appraisal 2021-2027, CBA, and Economic Appraisal

  view more...

Other NEWS

Central European Public Administration Review accepted for inclusion in Scopus

Central European Public Administration Review - new issue has been published

Call for applications for Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance MA programme

UNPAN Partners’ Newsletter July – August – September 2023

INVITATION:KosovaPAR2023 Conference on PAR for an Agile and Resilient Governance

DPIDG/DESA and the International Budget Partnership (IBP) Handbook for Auditors

CEPAR new issue Vol 21 No1 (2023)

Call for papers for EGPA 2023 Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, 5-7 September 2023

Freedom House NEW REPORT: Global Freedom Declines for 17th Consecutive Year

Call for PIONEER (Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance) application

Annex 13:

2-3PR: Village Government Capacity-Building in Kyrgyzstan: Employee Training and Development in Leninskoe Village Government of Chui Region

 

1. Project description

 

Project number

2-3PR

Project title

Village Government Capacity-Building in Kyrgyzstan: Employee Training and Development in Leninskoe Village Government of Chui Region

Responsible institution

The Academy of Management under the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, Bolotbek Orokov

NASPAA partner

International Centre for Democratic Governance, Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia, Dan Durning

NISPAcee partner

Ural State University, Russia, Sergei Pushkarev

Budget: planned

$12,000 USD

Budget: resources really used

$12,000 USD

Project period:

8.12.2003 – 30.9.2004

 

2.  Project purposes and goals 

 

This project addressed the problem of inadequate local government training in Kyrgyzstan.  The main goal of the project was to improve the performance of the village government through the effective implementation of sound training policies and programs.

The main objectives were: (1) identify problems in employee training and development that clearly answer the question of why village government offers no employee training; (2) develop policy recommendations to overcome the problems that have been identified; (3) assist village government to  implement training policy and programs; and (4) evaluate the training program.

Specific issues and questions expected to be explored were defining the types of training that would have the highest priority, defining methods and ways of developing the training courses, analysis of  international experience in solving identical problems in training of village government’s employees, surveying off-center or non-traditional ways of organizing employee training. On the basis of the project realization, the sustainable training practice in Leninskoe village was expected to be created.

The Ministry of Local Self-Governance and Regional Affairs of the Kyrgyz Republic was selected as the second governmental partner in carrying out the policy research. The ministry is responsible for developing and implementing the national policy on governance decentralization. This institution is working on developing independent, flexible and effective forms of local self-governance in the Kyrgyz Republic and is interested in any activity directed to achieving abovementioned tasks. As a partner institution, the ministry was interested in using the findings of the research to improve current decentralization policy and disseminate its positive experience throughout the country.

 

Main stages of the project were defined as follows:

 

1.       Information gathering.

2.       Analysis of the information and identification of the problems.

3.       Policy formulation. 

4.       Translation of recommendations and their presentation to the Leninskoe village government in a series of meetings. 

5.       Policy implementation. 

6.       Training policy and program evaluation.

7.       Writing the report and dissemination the experience.

 

3. Project realization

 

No major problems occurred during the project realization. The project team actively cooperated with government officials; all team members and other participants actively cooperated in the project and fulfilled their roles and responsibilities with quality work.

The only limited problem of the project is connected with timeframe of planned training courses. Because of other activities of project partners and some unexpected occurrences (a car accident, a heart attack), the training was postponed and a part of it was provided by Orokov alone using notes and materials prepared by Pushkarev and Durning.

 

4. Project outputs, outcomes and impacts

 

To carry out the project, the project team realized a lot of activities as planned by the project proposal, as follows:

 

1.       Conducted a survey of village government employees on their past training opportunities and their desire for additional training.

2.       Carried out a two-day training program aimed at teaching basic policy analysis while assisting village government employees in addressing the question of their training needs and desires. 

3.       Drafted a village policy on training for consideration by village leaders. 

4.       Consulted with village leaders to assist them in adapting a policy that reflects village needs and constraints.

5.       Identified the types of training now available to village governments in which village employees might participate.

6.       Conducted a survey of village government employees on their assessment of a draft training policy document.

7.       Conducted a survey of village government employees on their assessment of the basic policy analysis training.

 

More important outputs can be identified. The most important one is realization of the training course. The first day of training was attended by ten employees of the Leninskoye Village government and five employees of the neighboring Grozd Village government. 

Training materials were prepared including interesting policy analysis materials.  Training materials used for employee training in Leninskoe village government can be now used for teaching students in Bachelor, Master and Doctoral Programs in Public Administration at the Academy of Management. Problems identified within the project and solutions taken to solve the problems can serve as case studies. Materials prepared by project partners from the University of Georgia and Ural State University can be used as presentations and lecturing materials for Public Administration Programs.

            The main outcome is strengthened capacity of the Academy of Management and improved capacity of the local government in Leninskoe village.