EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN unpan.un.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

May 22 - May 24, 2024
Financial Management and Audit of EU Structural Funds, 2021-2027

May 22 - May 24, 2024
CAF Success Decoded: Leadership Commitment and Agile Management

May 23 - May 28, 2024
Ex-post Regulatory Evaluations

May 23 - May 30, 2024
Regulatory Impact Assessments

June 4 - June 6, 2024
Monitoring and Evaluation of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds programmes, 2021-2027

June 18 - June 19, 2024
Negotiate to Win: Essential Skills for Bilateral Negotiations

June 26 - June 27, 2024
Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures

September 11 - September 12, 2024
ICSD 2024

November 6 - November 12, 2024
Cohesion Policy Project Appraisal 2021-2027, CBA, and Economic Appraisal

  view more...

Other NEWS

Central European Public Administration Review accepted for inclusion in Scopus

Central European Public Administration Review - new issue has been published

Call for applications for Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance MA programme

UNPAN Partners’ Newsletter July – August – September 2023

INVITATION:KosovaPAR2023 Conference on PAR for an Agile and Resilient Governance

DPIDG/DESA and the International Budget Partnership (IBP) Handbook for Auditors

CEPAR new issue Vol 21 No1 (2023)

Call for papers for EGPA 2023 Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, 5-7 September 2023

Freedom House NEW REPORT: Global Freedom Declines for 17th Consecutive Year

Call for PIONEER (Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance) application

V. Working Group on Public Sector Finance and Accounting

WG Programme Coordinators:
Zeljko Sevic, University of Greenwich, UK 
E-mail: Z.Sevic@gre.ac.uk


NISPAcee Project Manager:

Elena Žáková, Email: zakova@nispa.org
 
Theme 2006: Managing Local Public Debt in the Countries in Transition: An Issue of Fiscal Capacity or Somethings Else?
 
The main goal of this research is to examine the policy and practice of local public debt and its management. Decentralisation, devolution, delegation, de-concentration and similar actions aimed at bringing government closer to the people, assume that enough public funds are made available to local government bodies and their independent agencies. In order to deliver this local governments are to be given enough resources to be successful in delivering newly acquired services and exercising attracted powers. Usual point of departure is that local government will be given approximately the amount that the central government has spent rendering delegated services. However, with the constant squeeze of the public purse, usually the powers and services are transferred, but this move is not followed by the transfer of corresponding resources. Therefore, local (sub-national) governments are forced to look for other sources of revenue. Usually, they may seek to establish independent local revenue streams, but the problem is that often they need prior approval of the central government before the levies are imposed. Similarly, the local governments often have to seek prior approval before applying for loans or other forms of debt.
 
The public debt limits are usually regulated by law and enforced by the central bank, which monitors the national level of indebtedness, acting as a government agent, especially when the debt is with a foreign element. Central governments can in the final instance monetise their debt, but this is not an option for local and other sub-national level governments. They are more treated similarly to private borrowers and they can do default on their debt. Sub-national governments are evaluated by private rating agencies and investors are interested in their standing, as the interest that they will pay will depend not only on inflation, maturing and also on the risk of default associated with a particular class of securities. Although, traditionally the focus in the Western public finance (public financial management) literature has been on attracting funds through the issuance of securities, one should not neglect the classical loans and credits that commercial banks can extend to local governments. In fact, in most developing and transitional economies, this is the most preferred form of municipal debit.
 

The Group welcomes both theoretical and empirical work in local government debt management in CEECs and fSU countries and encourages submission by both academics and practitioners, being especially interested in joint work submitted in collaboration between academics and practitioners. The papers have to be up to 8,000 words long and comply with the general NISPAcee publication guidelines. It is expected that the output of the group with be an edited volume and a special issue of a learned journal.

Download  Reserach protocol (40k)