The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG5: Public Finance and Public Financial Management
Author(s)  Irena Klemenčić 
  University of Zagreb
Zagreb  Croatia
Durman Petra, Rogic Lugaric Tereza, Musa Anamarija,  
 
 Title  OPEN BUDGETS: OPEN DATA AS A TOOL FOR FISCAL AND TAX TRANSPARENCY
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Today, the principles of government transparency, openness and responsiveness in relation to public are inevitable components of good governance in general. In area of public finance they are particularly emphasized because citizens’ informing and familiarization with government revenues and expenditures represents basic mechanism for holding public authorities accountable in relation to public, but is also related to the protection of human rights taxpayer protection and possibilities for public participation. Fiscal transparency has intensely been advocated by international organizations, such as International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, United Nations, and other, particularly within the initiatives such as Open Government Partnership (OGP) and other anti-corruption programs.
In area of public finance, transparency occurs in two main forms – the budget (fiscal) transparency and the tax transparency. Budget transparency is related to expenditure side, while tax transparency refers to the revenue side of public finance system. Informing citizens about government spending represents a mechanism of holding government accountable for its actions, which means it is an instrument for performing public oversight. It also ensures less opportunities for corruptive and other unethical behaviour and has potential to strenghten legitimacy and public trust in political institutions.
Terms of budget (fiscal) transparency and openness are often used as synonyms. Although interrelated, they refer to different processes in relation between government and the public. The principle of transparency is related to the visibility and availability of different types of government information to the public, i.e. it connotes a one-way process of communication from government to the public. The principle of openness includes the principle of transparency, but goes even further – citizens’ access to information is a prerequisite for opportunity to provide a feedback information. When referring to budgetary process, e-consultations and participatory budgeting are among most commonly used instruments. Open budget data embraces only government information, that is, data on budgetary process available in open formats and appropriate for re-use on behalf of interested public (users).

The main research question of the paper refers to the level of availability and quality of open budget data at local level of government in Croatia, and factors affecting the level of openness and the quality of data. In order to conduct our analysis, we rely on content analysis of budget data published by Croatian local units (cities and municipalities), with aim to analyze formats in which budget data are published, available datasets and content of budget data. Our preliminary analysis has shown that (i) legal requirements for open budget data are in place, but focused on quantitative rather than qualitative aspects of budget data; (ii) significant differences in the format of open budget data can be found between cities; and (iii) certain specificities of open data in area of public finances can be detected in relation to other categories of open data, referring to the content of open budget data and in relation to citizens’ interest and familiarization with public budget.