The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone
WG 4: Politico-Administrative Relations in CEE

Chairs:

  • Bernadette Connaughton, Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Limerick, Ireland
Dr Bernadette Connaughton is a Lecturer in Public Administration and served as Head, Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Limerick, from 2012-2015. Her teaching and research interests include comparative politico-administrative relations, ministerial advisers, environmental policy, and Europeanisation. From 2002-2008 she co-chaired the NISPAcee working group on Politico-Administrative Relations with Georg Sootla and B.Guy Peters. Her recent publications include a chapter in Ministers, Minders and Mandarins: An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies (eds R. Shaw and C. Eichbaum) and a book The Implementation of Environmental Policy in Ireland: Lessons from translating EU directives into action (MUP in press).
  • Katarina Staronova, Institute of Public Policy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
Katarina Staronova graduated from Wagner School of Public Service, New York University USA and Central European University Budapest, Hungary. She hold PhD. from political science at Comenius University Bratislava Slovakia. In 2003 she worked as a research fellow at Woodrow Wilson Research Center, Washington D.C., USA.
She is an associate professor at the Institute of Public Policy, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia, having co-founded it in 2005 and which offers first MPA program in Slovakia. At the same time she teaches at the Leadership program of RANEPA, Moscow since 2018 and is a guest lecturer at several Universities in CEE countries. Her research/scientific activities specialize on politico-administrative relations, public administration modernization, civil service reform, the process of public policy creation (including the transposition process), etc. She was part of a working group at the Government Office Slovakia, preparing Strategy for human resource management in the public sector 2015-2020, and in creating the new Civil Service Law, which came into effect on 1 June 2017. She is an author of numerous academic articles and studies on issues in civil service, e.g. baseline report on Individual Performance Appraisal in Central Government Organizations in Western Balkans.
She also works as a consultant in the issues of public administration reform, civil service management and policy capacity of civil servants for the World Bank, UNDP, and OECD, where she has participated in analytical missions in countries such as Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Moldova, Kosovo, Georgia, Romania and others.


Report


The Working Group on Politico-Administrative Relations (PAR) in CEE held three sessions at the Belgrade conference gathering. The PAR themes covered were explored in relation to country representation from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Ireland, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. 

Our papers investigated familiar, yet enduring, themes in politico-administrative relations – the appointment, retention and turnover of top public servants, patronage and rewards, control of the bureaucracy vs meritocracy, political and administrative coordination, impacts of government formation/coalition, governments, legislative changes, trust. Underlying the PAR challenges arising in most of the cases covered is the entrenchment and extent of politicisation. The central level of government was covered in most papers which looked at advisers, the role of external actors and experts, advisory committees/structures, coordination mechanisms, the expansion and (political) capacities of Prime Ministers’ Offices, and policy advisory systems (PAS) (notably Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia). Attention to the local level was illustrated in the Romanian case and Labour Offices in Slovakia. 

The sessions also included a study of developing a climate action plan at the local level. The analysis of the Prague climate plan case used a framework to acknowledge the significance of ceremony and ritual in policy formulation and understanding the interactions and influence of key policy making actors. An additional paper looking at the local level in Poland explored governance structures, leadership, and community power. All those who registered had been also present. 2 people from accepted papers did not register. 

Two significant issues arose in the deliberations: 

-First, a reminder that conceptual frameworks and theoretical approaches developed to investigate PAR in Western liberal democracies may have limited utility in guiding explanations of PAR in Central and Eastern European settings experiencing democratic backsliding, recurrent crises, hyper-politicisation, lack of trust and transparency. There are a range of circumstances and experiences in the countries reviewed in the working group whereby standard typologies and interpretations of politicisation phenomena clearly do not demonstrate a ‘goodness of fit’.  This is evident in role definitions and accommodations, the complexities in mapping career pathways, patterns of personalisation and patronage, the use of personal networks to address deficits in expertise, so-called ‘invisible advisers’, the pervasiveness and grip of party (and leadership) control in state institutions and distribution of resources. 

-Second, the dilemma of a lack of publicly available electronic data sources, the potential limitations of freedom of information requests and some evidence of misreporting on the civil and public service. Authors referred to the ‘research of the missing data’ as these gaps makes it very difficult to map and survey PAR themes and illustrate a lack of transparency. 

A call for papers for the 32nd NISPAcee conference in Tbilisi will be issued in the coming months. We look forward to collaborating with our working group members and welcome new participants. Early career researchers and PhD students working on PAR themes are also encouraged to submit abstracts on PAR topics for the next working group sessions.