The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG6: Evidence-Based Public Policy Making
Author(s)  Jaroslav Dvorak 
  Klaipeda University
Klaipeda  Lithuania
 
 
 Title  Cost-effectiveness analysis of low vision rehabilitation programs
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Jaroslav Dvorak
Abstract  
  
Rehabilitation programs and services for the blind and low vision are fairly widely studied in the field of interdisciplinary research, as revealed by meta-studies and general reviews (van Nispen et al., 2020; Binns et al., 2012; Ryan, 2014). Obviously, this is determined by the nature of the applied programs or the services themselves. Most of the time, the problems of program availability, content, application of individual measures, benefits for participants and other issues are raised and analyzed by ophthalmologist researchers, less often by optometry specialists. On the other hand, the research field has notable publications authored by occupational therapists, psychologists, sociologists or social work researchers (Ravenscroft, 2019). It is noteworthy that hundreds of publications have been published in various approaches, on different topics, since 1986, when international conferences (USA, Canada, and UK) sponsored by the American Foundation for the Blind developed the modern model of low vision rehabilitation programs (Markowitz, 2016). Similar content-responsive models have been developed for individuals with vision loss. On the other hand, both Samuel N. Markowitz, one of the leading researchers in the field, as well as some WHO and other researchers emphasize that there is no best and evidence[1]based "gold standard" (aka "Preferred Practice Pattern"). ; Markowitz, 2016; Mogk, 2016). The purpose of the research is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of services provided by social rehabilitation programs. Quantitative and qualitative evidence reflects that the lives of blind people can change significantly even within two weeks of social rehabilitation. Blind people get value for money when participating in a social rehabilitation program because they are offered real help. Blind persons gain a sense of peace, security and confidence, begin to live independently, improve their psychological health, and some of them find employment. On the other hand, the program creates opportunities for communication and socialization in society, because blind people are often left to their own devices.