The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG4: Politico-Administrative Relations in CEE
Author(s)  Eva Hejzlarova 
  Charles University
Prague  Czech Republic
 
 
 Title  „Climate plan for Prague“ as a ceremonial gesture: perceptions of municipal politicians and bureaucrats
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Eva Hejzlarova
Abstract  
  
Climate change is recognized as a large-scale issue resolved mainly through global or national policy initiatives. However, municipalities are getting involved too. The paper will focus on the political and bureaucratic efforts associated with climate change responses in the capital of the Czech Republic – Prague.
The main subject of our research interest will be one of the key policy documents approved by the City council in 2019 „Climate plan for Prague 2030“ (Klimatický plán hl. m. Prahy do roku 2030). Regarding this document I will observe two layers: policy-pragmatic and semantic - in both of these layers, the role of politico-administrative relations will be highlighted.
The first – policy-pragmatic – layer will describe the specific processes and motivations that led to the drafting and approval of this policy document (the document was preceded by other documents, commitments to international networks and conventions, etc., and has also gone through several commissions). I will focus on the history of the document and the policy infrastructure associated with it; I will interview both public administration employees and politicians involved in the process to understand the logics behind the document infrastructure and also roles these distinct actors play in it. Previous research shows that the nature of the document is rather formal - no financial resources have been allocated to the climate plan, nor does the document have a strong promoter.
In the second – semantic – layer, I look at how this document´s formal nature is dealt with by political leaders on the one hand and bureaucrats (often having a strong environmental background), on the other. To analyse the meanings associated with either explicit or implicit (or even self-) negotiations of the non-implementable status of the Climate plan, I will use the theoretical perspective of policy as a myth and ceremony. The perspective focuses on the phenomenon where policy does not focus on implementation here and now, but creates only the appearance that the public policy problem is considered important and creates only non-binding structures that can be used in future. The ambition of the paper is to contribute to deepening and extending this theoretical framework.
In this paper, I will empirically draw on document analysis and expert interviews.
The empirical aim of the paper is to explore possibilities of connecting the climate change public policy document agenda with the concepts of policy as myth and ceremony. The theoretical aim of the paper is to explore the possibilities of connecting the concepts of policy as myth and ceremony with the politico-administrative scholarship.