The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG6: Evidence-Based Public Policy Making
Author(s)  Eva Hejzlarova 
  Charles University
Prague  Czech Republic
Štěpánka Volfová, Faculty of Social Sciences, Prague, Czechia 
 
 Title  “It was a school year like any other”: evidence-based approach regarding school quarantines and hybrid education in Czechia in the school year 2021/2022
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Eva Hejzlarova
Abstract  
  
The substantive topic of the paper is quarantines of school children and related hybrid education in the period from September 2021 to April 2022, when (not only) the Czech education system was strongly affected by the covid-19 pandemic. The main research question is what the roots of non-evidence in this period and in this topic are. Alongside, we will also discuss the questions of the necessity of evidence within the crisis period and of the role of private sector companies in providing evidence.

This paper emerged as a side-line of our original research interest in the analysis of the implementation structure and various interpretations of the applied policy recommendations. We followed the path from the ministerial guidelines through state administration institutions such as the Regional Public Health Authority and the Czech School Inspectorate, the municipal authority responsible for schools in its area and the schools where we were interested in the position of principal (or his/her deputy for the first grade - ISCED 1) and finally the teacher in the first grade (ISCED 1). We aimed to understand how in the process of implementation the policy meaning was interpreted and transformed at various levels of the implementation structure and what individual actors considered as important in a given situation and how they interpreted the policy in their particular contexts.

To put our investigation in a larger context, we aimed to find any evidence possible. We found out that neither state administration nor municipal authority had only limited evidence of how many children were unable to attend full-time education and to what extent. While the previous pandemic years of 2019/20 and 2020/21 school years where “lockdowns” were the key measure to control the disease, the 2021/22 school year was considered "normal" by the authorities and was monitored using only the usual indicators. At the end of the day, only partial evidence was provided to us by a private software company providing schools with electronic application working with attendance and absence records and the management of grades and communication between school and family.

In the case study we work with expert interviews with representatives of different parts of the implementation structure and their perception of evidence.