The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG4: Politico-Administrative Relations in CEE
Author(s)  Petra Bayerová 
  Comenius University
Bratislava  Slovakia
Katarína Staroňová, Institute of Public Policy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia 
 
 Title  Bringing Expertise or Political Responsiveness to Agency Level? Career Paths of Heads of Labour Offices in Slovakia 2010-2022
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Petra Bayerová
Abstract  
  
The paper builds upon the theory of patronage appointments and politicization as a lens of studying these practices on agency level in Slovakia, one of the most politicized CEE countries. The research investigates whether personal ties, party affiliation or expertise influence the appointments of senior civil servants as heads of these agencies. Thus, conceptually it adopts the Ramos, Peters and Panizza (2019) as well as Staronova and Rybar (2021) framework of patronage appointments. Empirically, it is based on the unique dataset of all heads of Labour office agencies that held office in the period 2010-2022. This article investigates whether the change in the formal way of recruitment from political appointees to meritocratic selection makes a difference in career paths of the heads of 42 Labour offices. The formal legislative change from political to meritocratic appointment took place in 2015 which enables us to take into consideration also various government types. Therefore, the research with its unique dataset has the potential to contribute to the debate on patronage and politicization on agency level as well as on the professional characteristics of civil servants between different forms of recruitment.

Key words: politicization, patronage, meritocracy, career paths, senior civil servants, agencies, political appointments