The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG9: The Rule of Law & Public Administration
Author(s)  Gyorgy Gajduschek 
  Corvinus University of Budapest
Budapest  Hungary
 
 
 Title  Civic Culture and the Quality of the Rule of Law. The Position of the Post-communist Countries in a World-wide Statistical Comparison
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Gyorgy Gajduschek
Abstract  
  
“The "rule of law” (RoL) is a traditional principle, aimed at limiting the power of the state, administrative institutions …” This paper provides the first results from an analysis of the statistical relationship between civic, more specifically, legal culture and the stability and quality (depth) of the RoL. The research is based on a statistical analysis of a database compiled of (a) RoL indicators (e.g. Freedom House, World Justice Project) and (b) widely available cultural indicators, some of which may be relevant from the point of view of legal culture (e.g. Hofstede’s individualism, power-distance; Inglehart’s secular-rational values; support for democratic values, including separation of powers from World Value Survey) and (c) some control variables such as GDP/capita or religion. We collect the above information Worldwide.
In this paper, we attempt to answer the following questions: (0) Where do post-communist (i.e. not only CEE but also former-Soviet countries score on the RoL indices, Worldwide, in the ‘Western’ hemisphere and in Europe; and how has that changed since the early years of transition? (1) How does this set of countries fit the general tendencies (if such tendencies could be detected at all)? (2) Are there, and if yes, what are the main potential explanatory factors of difference? (3) Most importantly, can the fact itself that these countries were ‘communist’ be considered such a – dichotomous – factor? In other words, may the post-communist countries be treated as a more or less homogenous cluster in this regard?
Thus, the proposed paper steps somewhat outside of the RoL-PA relationship as it investigates the nexus between citizens’ values and beliefs and RoL as the political-legal environment of administration.