The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG1: Local Government
Author(s)  Adela Gasiorowska 
  University of Warsaw
Warsaw  Poland
 
 
 Title  Deliberation in the service of just transition. Evaluation of deliberation in Polish Citizens’ Assembly on Energy Costs
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Adela Gasiorowska
Abstract  
  
Tackling the challenges of climate change and the energy crisis requires public administration to undertake firm actions toward a just transition. Since the policy-making in the area of just transition requires consideration of various problems and concerns numerous social groups, it can be improved by the use of participatory and deliberative tools, such as citizens’ assemblies.
To provide expected benefits, deliberative processes should comply with certain criteria formulated in the literature (Gutmann, Thompson 2004, Cohen 2005, Fishkin 2009, Gastil et al. 2012). However, there are still very few studies evaluating the practical implementation of deliberation within citizens’ assemblies and similar processes (Knobloch et al. 2013, Farrell et al. 2013, Suiter et al. 2016).
Thus, the aim of the study is to (1) evaluate deliberation in a citizens’ assembly with the use of an evaluation model formulated by Gastil et al. (2012), (2) identify the causes of (non)fulfilment of specific evaluation criteria, and (3) identify elements of design or implementation of the assembly which could be improved to raise the quality of the deliberation.
The research will be based on the case study of the First Polish Citizens’ Assembly on Energy Costs, organised in 2022. The case study will be conducted with the use of desk research analysis, participatory observation of deliberation process, in-depth interviews and focus groups interviews. Desk research analysis is aimed to investigate the design of the deliberation, while the aim of participatory observation is to analyse its implementation. The interviews, conducted with various groups of actors participating in the assembly (assembly members, stakeholders, organisers and observers, who are experts on deliberative democracy) are aimed to complement the findings of desk research and participatory observation.