The 31th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference 2023 Beograd, Serbia, May 25-27, 2023

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  31st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG5: Public Finance and Public Financial Management
Author(s)  Lucie Sedmihradska 
  University of Economics of Prague
Praha   Czech Republic
Eduard Bakoš, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic 
 
 Title  Local government debt and its monitoring in the Czech Republic
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Lucie Sedmihradska
Abstract  
  
Early detection of local fiscal problems can help to resolve them before they turn into crises. The Czech Republic uses two types of fiscal rules which serve as such early detection devices: monitoring of local government management and rules for fiscal responsibility. Monitoring is with some modifications in place since 2009 and rules for budget responsibility since 2017.
The financial situation of the Czech local government is generally very good, total debt amounted by the end of 2021 to 1,4% of GDP, i.e. 3,4% of total public debt. Out of 6 250 municipalities, only five rather small municipalities did not fulfill any of the valid rules and 578 municipalities and no region violated the rule of budget responsibility in 2021.
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of these rules regarding their ability to provide early detection of fiscal problems and to compare their outcomes with other signs of risky management such as audit findings and substantial lag in approval of financial statements.
The analysis is based on data provided by the Ministry of Finance either through its data portal Monitor (in case of monitoring, rules for budget responsibility, and approval of financial statements) and open data database (in case of audit findings) and covers the period from 2012 to 2021.