The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Panel: Behavioral Interventions in Public Sector
Author(s)  Patrik Pavlovský 
  Comenius University
Bratislava  Slovakia
Sloboda Matus,  
 
 Title  How Reminders to Debtors on a Local Tax Affects their Behavior? The Field Experiment from Slovak City Prievidza
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Nudging claims potency in making it more likely that people will behave in a manner, in which the nudge
designers want them to. Functionally, thus, nudging can be seen as a tool and as such it can be utilized
by various actors, among others also by public administrators. Recent but exponential growth of case
studies describing the application of behavioral insights onto public policy implicates that public
administration across the globe are becoming more and more aware of this tool. They seem to be also
significantly more open for utilization of these insights in favor of enhancing the efficiency of their
classic, public policies.

This paper describes yet another case of applying behavioral insights for making public policies more
effective. We conducted a field experiment in partnership with local public administration of Slovak city
Prievidza. The experiments was designed to find out whether employing a second reminder with
particular framing in communication with the debtors on a local tax (waste collection) has an effect on
their behavior. In this experiment, we specifically analyzed the time that it took contacted debtors to
pay the overdue fee after receiving our reminder and compared it with the time it those who payed the
overdue fee prior to this second reminder. Due small sample size, we were not able to test various
framings, but this will be the subject of our future experiments.

The rationale behind designing this particular behavioral intervention is that the sooner Prievidza
disposes with the money it expected to already have, the better it can actually function in terms of cash
flow, and provision of good quality services.