The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG1: Local Government
Author(s)  Tibor Laszlo Busko 
  Ludovika University of Public Service
Budapest  Hungary
 
 
 Title  Local Public Service Management in Contemporary Hungary - From a Local Government Point of View
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Tibor Laszlo Busko
Abstract  
  
The Section 2, paragraph 2 of the Act CLXXXIX. of 2011 on Hungarian Local Governments declares that ‘local governance expresses as well as represents the local public will in a democratic manner, creating publicity in the local public affairs’. The local public affairs are in a large extent associated with the citizens’ supply of local public services. Thus, local public service management should be interpreted as an essential part of the ‘good local governance’. However, since the right wing coalition led by the FIDESZ Party came to power in 2010, the role and competences of the Hungarian local governments, not independently of the emergence of the ‘New Weberian State’ throughout the world after the 2008 global financial crisis, has been significantly rearranged. Apart from anything else, a lot of mandatory and/or voluntary self-government functions and competences provided previously at local level (for example, the whole local public education system and so on) has been detracted by the State. This is because it seems necessary to scrutinize the Hungarian local governments’ contribution to the local public service system under these changing circumstances.

The paper will be divided into two main parts. The first part of the paper tries to systematize the local governments’ role in ensuring local public services in an adequate and sustainable manner, in accordance with the customers’ expectations, too. The systematization will be done in the light of (a) the degree of the influence of local governments on the local public services, and (b) the efficient operation of the local public services in question.

a) As for the degree of the influence of local governments on the local public services, we aim at distinguishing – in relation to the so-called ‘mandatory’ and/or the ‘voluntary’ local government tasks – (a1) the direct exercise of functions, (a2) a wide range of delegated forms of the exercise of functions and, mainly in the context of the local public services which has been recentralized after 2010, (a3) the exercising an informal influence.

b) Apart from the degree of the influence of local governments on the local public services, we will argue for the hypothesis that the local governments’ resilience (otherwise: the adaptive capability to changing circumstances) has a huge positive impact on the efficient operation of all local public services.

On that basis, the main thesis of the paper is that local governments’ role in ensuring a local public service can be relatively clearly identifiable if we integrate the local public service into the context of (a) and (b) points. In order to verify our main thesis, the second part of the paper tries to present a few examples from the area of the contemporary Hungarian local public service management. Adaptation strategies to the external situation (especially: to the regulatory environment) and the sustainable exploitation of local governments’ own resources will be treated as focal points of this empirical examination. By means of those examples/specific strategies, we will be hopefully able to justify the importance of local governments in an era in which the opportunities for their enforcement of interest in the field of local public service management seems deeply problematic.