The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG6: Evidence-Based Public Policy Making
Author(s)  Olexandr Kilievych 
  National University "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Kyiv  Ukraine
 
 
 Title  Evidence-based Policy Analysis in the Digital Era: Cases of Developing Countries
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Olexandr Kilievych
Abstract  
  
Policy analysis by its nature, causes of origin and development in the OECD countries has shown the need for wide use of not only diverse data but, first and foremost, evidence in analysing problems, policy environment, stakeholders, policy options and policy impacts.
Widespread digitalisation creates new possibilities for a radical improvement of the policy analysis performance and enhancement of its effectiveness.
Developing countries have relatively modest achievements in implementing policy analysis to achieve inclusive growth and sustainable development goals. However, the rapid digital transformation in developed countries creates new opportunities and, at the same time, creates complex challenges in policy making processes for developing countries, especially considering the effects of globalization.
We consider several cases in the field of evidence-based policy analysis in the context of digital transformation: 1) the case of Ukraine with the most experience and significant potential in the field of policy analysis among post-soviet countries, as well as in the field of digitization of the economy; the government considers European integration to be the highest priority of its activities, which is being targeted by a well-developed civil society; 2) The case of Kyrgyzstan, which initiates policy analysis in government, has the most influential civil society institutions in the Central Asian region; 3) The case of Tajikistan, implementation of policy analysis in the country is hampered by the authoritarian system of government. All three countries have serious problems in economic development, negative indicators of poverty and corruption.
We consider the practice of introducing evidence-based policy methodology in these countries at different phases of the policy process, from the agenda setting to policy evaluation. It underlines the underestimation of the speed of the digital economy development and its growing influence on the policy environment, on the formation and implementation of policies, especially in Central Asia. After all, the global digital economy and global digital transformations inevitably change the entire world landscape. It threatens to deepen the digital divide in countries whose governments ignore digital development, which can only aggravate existing social problems.