The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG3: Public Administration Reform in CEE and CA
Author(s)  Liviu Radu 
  Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca  Romania
 
 
 Title  Historical and Future Perspective on Public Administration Reforms in Countries from Central and Eastern Europe
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Liviu Radu
Abstract  
  
Historical and future perspective on public administration reforms in countries from Central and Eastern Europe

The wave of 1989 Revolutions seemed to open the door to a unified Europe. The practical process for achieving this goal was the extension of the European Union, an organization that proved to be so successful until that historical moment in bringing the European citizens into a common home. But the extension of EU after 1989 proved to be a far more complicated process that it was envisaged. Fifteen year passed until the first ten countries were accepted as EU member states. As for Romania and Bulgaria, integrated three years after, many voices in various European institution are claiming that their accession was premature. The differences between the standard of living and the general performances of the two countries as compared with the ones from the old European Union member states and the ten states integrated in 2004 seems to be the same if not increasing.
On the other hand, also among the member states accepted in 2004 there are significant differences in terms of development and standard of living. Ten out of twelve of the mentioned countries are former members of the communist block and had to undertake major economic, political and administrative reforms to adapt their countries to the values and standards of the European Union. The reforms of public administration should had the aim to provide to their citizens positive rights close to those that Western European citizens are benefiting.
The differences between the former communist countries and other EU member states and between the former communist countries themselves may be explained by the pace and the success of public administration reforms. The future of the European project may depend on the answers related to the causes that lead to success of the reforms in some of the countries and the failure in others.
The issue is important from the point of view of the further development of the European project. The candidate countries for further accession are having similar problems with the performances of their administrative systems and are undertaking or will have to undertake major administrative reforms.
That is to say, the lessons learned past fifth teen years in the field of administrative reforms can be valuable for future development in the field. The study will address a sample of countries that will be decided in the near future