The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG6: Evidence-Based Public Policy Making
Author(s)  Bianca Radu 
  Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca  Romania
 
 
 Title  Empirical Insights into the Decision-making Process at Municipal and County Level in Romania
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Bianca Radu
Abstract  
  
The paper aims to analyze the process of decision making at municipal and county level in Romania by analyzing the transcripts of the Local Councils and County Councils meetings from North-West Region between 2017 and 2018. In particular, we will analyze whether public institutions meet the transparency provisions with regard to publicly announcing the draft legislative proposals 30 days in advance of being subject to voting in the council meeting, whether public institutions post online all the documents that justify the draft legislative proposals, and announce the citizens when and to whom they can send recommendations. In addition, we will analyze the participation of different stakeholders in the decision-making process: whether citizens formulate policy recommendations on the draft legislative proposals, and the extent of citizens’ participation during council meetings. We aim to identify whether citizens and representatives of other organizations voice recommendations during council meetings and whether councilors include their proposals in final form of the legislative acts. We aim to extract all the information from the transcripts of the municipal and county council meetings and draft legislative proposals, which are posted online on the public institutions’ webpages, and to conclude on whether proposals are based on sound evidences and analyses, and whether broader consultations are conducted before decisions are made. In addition to analyzing the implementation of the legal provisions regarding the decision-making process, we will collect information about whether public institutions collaborate with external experts in order to increase the expertise and the quality of the decision-making process.