The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG3: Public Administration Reform in CEE and CA
Author(s)  Tigran Zanko 
  The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Moscow  Russian Federation
 
 
 Title  Reorganization of Federal Executive Authorities: Comparative Analysis of Russia and the USA
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Tigran Zanko
Abstract  
  
The article has an aim of comprehensive comparative analysis of approaches to the process of reorganization of federal executive authorities in the Russian Federation and the United States of America. Different legal frameworks significantly influence the logic and intensity of federal executive authorities transformation.
One of the key features of the administrative legal framework of the federal executive authorities of the Russian Federation is that the federal law "On executive authorities of the Russian Federation" that is foreseen by the Constitution has not been adopted for over 20 years, and their system and structure are regulated by legal acts of the President of the Russian Federation. As a result, during the period 2004-2018 approximately 60 decrees of the President of the Russian Federation that modify the system and structure of executive authorities have been adopted. So, based on this figure it can be easily calculated that on average every 85 days the structure of the federal executive authorities faces changes: executive authorities are established, abolished, merged, reformed, renamed or change their subordination.
Whereas in the USA starting from 1984 to the present, power to reorganize federal executive bodies has not been granted to the President of the United States. Thus, in the United States the powers to reorganize federal executive bodies are given to Congress and, therefore, a complex legislative procedure is required for any reorganization of executive authorities. As a result, since 2002 after establishing the Department of Homeland Security no federal executive department has been established or abolished in the United States.
Summing up the abovementioned development tendencies it can be concluded that the structure of the federal executive authorities in Russia is characterized by a fairly high rate of transformations taking place despite of the fact that there is a certain level of political stability within the country.
Obviously, public administration must be characterized by long-term goals and a stable apparatus for achieving them. Thus, one of the ways to improve the quality of reforms, reduce the unreasonably high rate of changes, ensure consistent and successive reform in the system and structure of the federal executive authorities of the Russian Federation is to regulate the executive branch by means of law that would also lead to more effective functioning of the mechanics of checks and balances.