The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
PhD Pre-conference Seminar
Author(s)  Olga Angelovska 
  Charles University
Praha 2  Czech Republic
 
 
 Title  A Multiple Stream Approach and Understanding Resistance and Change: the Case of Czech Hospitals
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Olga Angelovska
Abstract  
  
Recent decades the roles played by the state and the market in the public sectors have seen a major transformation. Health systems have had to cope with many socio-economic and political environment changes, such as pressures to contain costs, changes in the welfare state (Pierson 2001, Bonoli 2004), and globalization processes (Edwards, Wyatt, McKee 2004, Vetter 1995). A key feature of Czech health care reform after 1989 was the principle of de-monopolization and decentralization. At the same time, the health care reforms focused on the privatization of health care facilities and health care providers (Angelovská, Háva 2010). Long-term evaluation of the differences between private and public health have not been able to identify any significant positive evidence supporting the promised benefits of this privatization process (Maarse 2006). However, there is an inverse relationship between the level of solidarity in access to health care and competition (Saltman, Figueras 1998).
In my paper as well as in my Ph.D. thesis I focus on efforts to change the organizational-legal status of hospitals after 2000 when a reform of the state administration occurred. The main goal is to understand why some affords have been successful (the law passed in 2005) and some unsuccessful (the laws proposed in 2008 and 2017) in giving a legislative anchor to the new organizational-legal form of hospitals. In order to do this, I used the multiple stream framework which was developed by John Kingdon (1984) to explains how different streams (policy, politics and problem streams) couple and open a policy window that allows a policy change. While being a theory of agenda setting in US, Kingdon´s theory has been also applied to implementation processes and other public policy fields and countries (Kane 2016, Zohlnhofer et al. 2015, Herweg 2016, Ackrill at al. 2013, Mukherjee, Howlett 2015). I use a broadened concept combining the multiple streams framework and the policy process theory (Howlett, Connell, Perl 2016), which clarify why and up to what stage some of the initiatives succeeded or failed.
The research adopted a case study design. Data were obtained through document analysis (law proposals, resolutions of Constitutional Court, stenographic records, strategic documents etc.) and semi-structured interviews with experts in the health care policy.