The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG5: Public Finance and Public Financial Management
Author(s)  Jana Godarova 
  Masaryk University
Brno  Czech Republic
Starhova Iveta,  
 
 Title  Is the Non-take-up Problem present in the Czech Republic?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
The concept of a social state and its size differs from state to state and it is influenced by characteristics such as its history, measure of solidarity, citizen's mentality which is expressed in their wishes, etc. Through social system state wants to help the risk group of people such as seniors or families with children. The main question remains how extensive social system the Czech Republic can afford under the conditions that the state budget should be balanced.

In addition to the budget constraints on the system, states are also struggling with the non-take-up phenomenon. The situation where an individual or a household is entitled to relief or a social benefit under the legislation in force, but these benefits are not used in reality for various reasons. There are several reasons for this lack of use: (1) complexity or frequent changes to the system (2) difficulty of the application procedure (3) low awareness (4) stigma or shyness when the household would take it as a personal failure. The non-take-up rate can also depend on the income situation or the number of people in the household.

In the Czech Republic, insufficient attention is paid to this problem, despite the fact that a high rate of non-take-up can warn states about problems in setting up or targeting the system. Previous studies vary greatly in quantifying the effect of this phenomenon. They range between 30-90%, depending on the benefits system or the risk group definition.

The aim of this paper is to identify the extent of non-take-up phenomenon of social benefits in the Czech Republic and factors influencing them. To identify the gravity of the problem, authors use the microsimulation modeling with the data from the Czech EU-SILC survey from 2008 to 2017. The data from this sample survey give representative information on income distribution of individual types of households, information on the way, quality and financial demands housing, household long-term use equipment, and working, material and health conditions of adults living in households. The Czech EU-SILC survey covers approximately 8,000 households annually, which is approximately 18,000 individuals living in the Czech Republic. Part of the final discussion of the results will be the discussion of methodological and data constraints.