The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Pre-conference Seminar "How to Write a Good Policy Paper”
Author(s)  Judit Szakos 
  Ludovika University of Public Service
Budapest  Hungary
Szadeczky Tamas,  
 
 Title  Network Facilitating Innovation Policy – The Case of the Hungarian Cyber Security Ecosystem
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Judit Szakos
Abstract  
  
Stereotypically Central Eastern Europe (CEE) is full of creative, problem solving, or even problem hacking people. One can decide to accept this true or not, but it is widely accepted that cyber security can be one of the key sectors for the CEE region to boost and facilitate, not just regulate and fend off cyber space activities.
In this paper I follow the logic of network facilitating policy and innovation-enabling policy approach, where actors from every sector build horizontal linkages to the systems of innovation. This helps to boost innovation capacity of a certain geographical areas or sectors (building clusters) and help to appear on the international stage.
The Triple Helix Model – and its extended versions - deals with ecosystem as well, based on collaboration of state, universities and business, so do with media and culture-based society. This neo-institutional model is “focusing on interinstitutional networking and exchanges”.
In Hungary role of state-related actors are clarified in law, and national cyber coordinator has a role to facilitate all the other actors. On the other hand, there are many bottom-up and horizontal linkages which are not (fully) integrated to the Hungarian cyber security ecosystem.
My research question is the following: How does the Hungarian cyber security ecosystem look likein the Quintuple Helix Model?
To answer this question (1) I put actors to the Model, which role are decelerated in a law, then (2) I add universities, businesses, NGOs and other relevant actors with using snowball method. (3) To draw linkages I use Internet-based desk research, content analysis (with special attention to government strategies, like Hungarian Digital Wellbeing Program) and I conduct interviews.
This methodology shows us a preliminary scope of actor relations in Hungary. Strength of linkages and their role in institutional learning would be a useful topic for a further research.
From these first stage results one can see that there is a vivid community and a lot of potential, and with handling missing linkages and communication, building horizontal and vertical bridges (networks) could help a lot to perform better.
Mazzucato (2016) talks about market-creating framework, the evaluation of mission-oriented and market-creation policies and a perspective, called system of innovation what is a primarily need to build horizontal linkages between actors.
I use this theory in my conclusion as I summarize that using her mission-oriented framework in the activity of the national cyber coordinator and using network-based policies could put cyber security to a leading sector in Hungary.