The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Panel: The Rule of Law & Public Administration
Author(s)  Anamarija Musa 
  University of Zagreb
ZAGREB  Croatia
Kovač Polonca,  
 
 Title  For the Glory of the Rule of Law: Institutional and Procedural Guarantees of Access to Public Information in Seven CEE/SEE Countries
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Anamarija Musa
Abstract  
  
The right to public information (RTI) is of the key importance in a contemporary society and represents a fundamental principle of democracy and the rule of law. Through RTI, individual citizens or NGOs as beneficiaries acquire data influencing public governance and oversee the enforcement of the rule of law. In addition, as pursued by constitutional provisions and Freedom of Information acts (FOIA), a broad circle of authorities and private providers of public tasks are bound to disclose such data even proactively, unless there are legal grounds for any of specific exceptions. However, several analyses and comparative studies (e.g. Banisar 2006; Brandsma et al. 2010; Savino 2010, Galleta et al., 2015, Access Info Europe, Transparency International, GCRT, GRTI; Democracy Index, etc.) reveal that institutional and procedural guarantees highly influence how the law is implemented in practice. The relevant institutional elements include the impartiality and independence of an institution, sufficient resources and budgeting, accountability mechanisms, and similar. Likewise, the procedural elements include above all: procedural good administration rights, e.g. reasonable deadlines, the burden of costs, a balanced formality of a request and a reply, right to appeal, right to be heard and reasoning, etc. In the ex-socialist states of the CEE/SEE region, who have been at the different stages of the transition or have managed to achieve the effective democratic governance, the issue of the functioning of the rule of law and its subprinciple of transparency/access to information, is even more prominent and fragile.
This paper seeks to identify and analyze the institutional and procedural guarantees of the effective access to information in the CEE/SEE countries (Slovenia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania). The questions the paper seeks to answer is: a) to what extent the institutional and procedural guarantees of the access to information as defined by legal frameworks in selected countries confer to the international and EU standards; b) how are these implemented in practice and what are the features and main challenges in the implementation of designed legal frameworks.
In this paper, we intend to firstly address institutional framework for the protection of the right of access to information, indicating the level of independence of authorities such as information commissioners, agencies or ombudspersons, which is considered a key feature of effective protection of the right of access to information (e.g. model laws on access to information). Secondly, we intend to detect and analyze the procedural guarantees of the effective exercise of access to information, especially those related to the authorities bound by law, timeframes, costs, formalities of the requests, exclusions and judicial protection of the users of the right. Upon the construction of the indicators based on the literature and the recommended international standards, we intend to gather the empirical data by using methods of legal analysis, statistical data on the implementation of the RTI laws and the questionnaire sent to the institutions protecting the right to information.