The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Panel: The Rule of Law & Public Administration
Author(s)  Dawid Szescilo 
  University of Warsaw
Warsaw  Poland
 
 
 Title  Independence of Regulatory Authorities under EU Law: Failed Attempt to Create Fourth Branch of Government?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Dawid Szescilo
Abstract  
  
The classical Montesquieu's concept of tripartite division of powers is a cornerstone of the European administrative and legal tradition. However, it is clear that some important public institutions remain outside all three branches of power, e.g. ombudsman institutions or supreme audit bodies. The expansion of regulatory state added new type of institution that does not fit well into classical model, i.e. independent regulatory authorities (IRAs). They are distinguished by their special functions (supervising some markets, protecting competition and consumers) and extended – in comparison to all other agencies – scope of autonomy. The concept of IRAs was an important element of the US administrative tradition, but in Europe, prior to agencification era, central banks remained the only prominent example of institution falling under this category. The expansion of IRAs in the 80s and 90s in Western Europe and subsequently post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe, was not only part of broad agencification trend. It had its own specific background.

First of all, IRAs accompanied the transformation from positive state towards regulatory state. Last decades of the XXth century in many countries brought the wave of liberalization and privatization of markets previously monopolized by state-owned entities. Government bureaucracy withdrew from the role of the service provider and shifted to the position of organizer and regulator of the competitive markets populated now predominantly by private providers. Performing this new mission required specific organizational architecture. Assigning regulatory functions to the specialized administrative bodies providing high level of sectoral expertise was necessary, but not sufficient step. State as a regulator needed also credibility and trust from the regulated markets (especially from potential investors) by ensuring that regulatory decisions are not only made by experts, but they are also insulated from political influence. This was particularly important on the markets, where state-owned enterprises remained as competitors of private companies. The concept of IRAs became the ultimate response to those needs. It offered combination of necessary expertise with independence of regulators from direct influence of the political decision-makers. Independent regulators, as bodies neither directly elected by the people, nor directly managed by elected officials aimed at providing the markets with certainty and clarity about objectivity and integrity of regulatory actions.

However, labelling any government agency as independent, even in the legislation, has itself limited normative value. It does not determine any specific attributes of independence and does not guarantee that regulatory decisions are free from political influences. For this purpose, there is a need to elaborate comprehensive governance and accountability regime, where the required degree of independence is secured. As the expansion of IRAs in Europe is a process largely driven by the EU law, where the independence of regulatory authorities is set as a requirement in several areas, this paper aims at analyzing the EU concept of independent regulatory authorities. The main research question is whether the EU legislation provides consistent and comprehensive model of the IRAs’ independence. Subsequently, I consider whether the scope of independence required by the EU law for those bodies allows us to conclude that IRAs regulated by the EU law no longer can be perceived as a part of executive branch. This paper relies on doctrinal legal analysis accompanied with literature review on the concept of IRAs.