The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG8: Non-Governmental Organizations in CEE
Author(s)  Amelia Boyart-Bienenfeld 
  I do not belong to any Institution
Brussels  Belgium
 
 
 Title  The Potential Effects of Donor Funding Schemes on the Diversity and Sustainability of Central and Eastern European CSOs: the Example of the EEA and Norway Grants
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Amelia Boyart-Bienenfeld
Abstract  
  
This paper aims at answering the following question: do foreign donor funding make Central and Eastern European CSOs more or less sustainable?

Against the backdrop of new legal limitations of foreign funding sources for CSOs in Central Europe, it is surprising to see the limited number of evidenced-based studies on the effects of donor funding on CSOs’ structure. Indeed, most academic studies on the topic are exclusively focusing on CSOs in developing countries or on CSOs providing services. The work presented aims at filling this gap, using the example of the EEA and Norway Grants, the most important source of funding for CSOs in the region. The study will touch upon the 11 Central and Eastern EU Member States benefitting from the Grants and will focus on Poland and Romania, the two biggest beneficiaries (EUR 53M and EUR 46M for 2014-2021).

In its first chapter, this paper will build on the available research on the impact of the different types of funding (core v. project-based) (I). We will see how the EEA and Norway Grants fit these categories and will question the relevance of these analyses in the Central European context. The CSO environment in “new” EU Member States is indeed characterised by a high degree of diversity and commitment, but also by high levels of mistrust among the general population and threats coming from state institutions.

The second chapter will address the organisational effects of the grants on single CSOs (II). It will investigate whether they increase the effectiveness and efficiency of funded organisations through the development of a results-based approach, or whether on the other hand they put more burden on CSOs because of reporting requirements. The risk of dependence to external funding will also be addressed.

Finally, the impact of the EEA and Norway Grants on the third sector structure in Central and Eastern Europe in general will be discussed (III). The paper will analyse the institutional set-up of the EEA and Norway Grants as well as the implementation modalities of the grants, and will research in what ways these affect the sustainability of the CSO environment in these EU Member States.

Main sources for this research include literature from academia as well as evaluations and reports from various institutions. EEA and Norway grants data will be extracted from the project and programme results published on their website, as well as from other types of publications and documents provided to project promoters and fund operators.