The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG5: Public Finance and Public Financial Management
Author(s)  Sovik Mukherjee 
  St. Xavier's University
Kolkata  India
 
 
 Title  Tax Incidence of Two-Sided Monopoly Platforms
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Sovik Mukherjee
Abstract  
  
Many a market with network externalities is a two-sided platform. The present paper models a monopoly platform with buyers on one side and sellers on the other. There are a number of examples of monopoly platforms existing in reality. Sometimes, shopping malls or nightclubs or restaurants are located far off from others or when there is only one newspaper or a magazine or a journal in a particular market then the monopoly platform paradigm appears appropriate. Even the example of Adobe Reader, a few years back, as software for viewing any electronic document in ‘Portable Document Format (PDF)’ and a yellow pages directory of an incumbent telephone company are also very good examples in this regard. The platform charges a fixed membership fee and a variable usage fee from both the sides and the buyers and sellers are heterogeneous in terms of the per unit benefit they derive on the transaction of the product. The benefit of registration is that the members do not have to fill their identity details every time they log on the platform. So, it saves the members’ transaction cost. We characterize the equilibrium and check that whether it matches the results existing in the literature. Then we introduce ad valorem and specific tax on the buyer’s side of the platform alone. Some recent papers like — Belleflamme and Toulemonde (2016) report counter intuitive results like imposition of a higher tax on the platform transaction may actually be a boon for the platform through the strategic complementarities effects i.e. the effect on the platform’s profit through the modification of the other platform’s equilibrium prices. However Belleflamme and Toulemonde (2016) derive this result in the case of competing platforms. This paper makes an attempt to explore the incidence of taxation on a monopoly platform and checks whether similar results hold. While the incidence of the specific tax turns out to be similar to the standard monopoly case except that the extent of deadweight loss is lower, the incidence of ad valorem tax comes with a surprise. Among the counterintuitive results in case of ad valorem tax, we find that for efficient platforms the increase in tax rate may reduce the deadweight loss and also may lead to an increase in monopoly profit. Nevertheless the Laffer curve relation holds for both types of taxes and given the efficiency level of the platform, in the case of ad valorem tax the revenue is maximized at a higher rate than in the case of specific tax.