The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
PhD Pre-conference Seminar
Author(s)  Nejc Lamovšek 
  University of Ljubljana
Ljubljana  Slovenia
 
 
 Title  Use of Cross-efficiency Method on the Example of Primary Health Care Biomedical Laboratories in Slovenia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Nejc Lamovšek
Abstract  
  
ABSTRACT

Laboratory medicine is one of the most important contributors to/partakers in proper, effective, and quality patient care. Laboratories are present in the primary, the secondary, and the tertiary levels of health care and therefore form an integral part of each health institution and, consequently, of the public sector. Determining the efficiency of public biomedical laboratories in the primary level of health care can lead to the optimal utilisation of public resources.

Technical efficiency is defined as the most optimal use of the input sources for achieving the highest possible output. One of the main objectives of this paper is determining the technical efficiency of laboratories with the use of the DEA method and then ranging them with the use of the cross-efficiency method.

We use the data envelopment analysis (DEA), because it is one of the basic methods for determining the efficiency of public institutions. Moreover, it is a benchmark method for determining the efficiency in healthcare. It is nonparametric and it is not necessary to define the production function for its use. In our case, with an input-oriented DEA method, we achieve constant outputs with minimal inputs. The analyzed DEA data processing model is based on CCR by predicting a proportional change in both inputs and outputs. We also use the method of cross-efficiency for the objectification of the weights for the chosen inputs and output. The demonstration model for determining the efficiency of laboratories is shown on the example of sixteen primary health care institutions and their laboratories.

The results of the DEA analysis have shown that three (laboratories 2, 5 and 7) of the sixteen analysed laboratories are on the frontier of the highest efficiency. The rest of analysed laboratories have an efficiency score ranging from 26% to 95%. If cross-efficiency is used, laboratory 7 has the highest efficiency score of 99%, while the efficiency of other laboratories now ranges from 23% to 93%. The highest contribution to the calculation of total average efficiency of the group occurs when input 1 equals 100% and input 2 equals 0%, while output 1 and output 2 variables are in the ratio of 70: 30.



KEYWORDS

DEA, Efficiency, Laboratory, Primary health care, Slovenia