The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
VII. Public Administration Education
Author(s)  Katarina Staronova 
  Comenius University
Bratislava  Slovakia
Gajduschek Gyorgy, Sedlacko Michal,  
 
 Title  Master Programs of Public Administration and Management in CEE countries: Pathways and Identities
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Katarina Staronova
Abstract  
  
The mushrooming of MPA/MPM programs across the CEE region since the early 1990s begs the question of their regional convergence - as well as convergence towards a 'Western' ideal-type as opposed to reflecting distinct concerns arising out of historical factors and specific challenges of public administration reforms this region had to face (Staronova and Gajduschek 2017). Nevertheless, additional questions regarding the relationships between MPA/MPM programs and their cultural-political contexts emerge.
On the one hand, the programs have a performative role in regard to the organization of the relationship between the public and the state as well as understandings of the role of public administration and civil servants. The influence of individual program's 'identity' goes beyond just advocacy of a particular paradigm (NPM or otherwise), it includes a set of interpretation frames, values, cognitive tools and practical skills imparted upon the program's students. Program's 'identity' can thus be seen as, indirectly and through its graduates placed in key positions, contributing to the stabilization of particular sociopolitical orders and even specifically informing attempts at public administration reforms.
The context of the Eastern European public administration tradition has been recognised to possess specifics that make it distinct from Anglo-American tradition or continental European tradition with its strong and deeply ingrained legalistic-bureacratic (i.e. Weberian) features (e.g. Ziller 2003, Peters and Pierre 2003, Demmke and Moilanen 2010). The cultural-cognitive national context and administrative tradition (which, due to similarity as well as exchange, can be - more abstractly - labelled as distinctly Eastern
European) shapes the identity of a program, together with the initial imprinting of potential identity attributes upon the programs and the pressures arising out of the regulative institution of national accreditation procedures.
This contribution looks at MPA/MPM programs in 5 countries (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovaka and Slovenia), exploring - and attempting provisional explanations on - the multiple relationships between national contexts and the 'identities' of the programs. For this we study several parameters of the programs' 'identities' including course profile, size, date of establishment, and mid-career vs. initial education character. It would also seem the programs adapt to other programs in the country (occupying specific positions in the wider administrative field), as well as region and the West (meaning that some specific understandings relevant to MPA/MPM programs diffuse across national boundaries).