The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
III. PA Reform
Author(s)  Elena Dobrolyubova 
  The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Moscow  Russian Federation
 
 
 Title  Evaluating Performance of Government Inspection Bodies: Evolving Approaches
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Elena Dobrolyubova
Abstract  
  
Ensuring the public safety and limiting administrative barriers have been the two core objectives of the most reforms in the area of business inspections and regulatory enforcement for the past decade or so. However, measuring these efforts has proved quite challenging both in OECD countries, and in Russia. Unlike in the areas of financial management, public services, or procurement, there is little cross-country comparative data on business inspections which could suggest whether a country is doing well on one or another area subject to state control (with some exceptions, such as tax and customs control, which still seem to confirm the general rule). There is also no common framework for measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of business inspections activity, while some approaches to good practices have been proposed only recently by the OECD.
This debate is highly relevant to the Russian public administration reform agenda where improving the performance of regulatory enforcement bodies has been taken as a strategic priority. Achieving the objective of this reform would call for re-inventing the performance framework of the government inspections bodies, which is currently fragmented and inconsistent and has a significant bias on sanctions rather than on ultimate outcomes of safe public environment ensured at a reasonable cost.
The objective of this paper is to develop a framework for defining and evaluating both the effectiveness and the efficiency in the area of regulatory enforcement and to apply this framework to several areas of inspection activities (such as occupational and food safety) in Russia.
The paper first reviews the existing approaches to measuring performance of government inspection bodies both in selected OECD countries (based on both literature review and practical examples). It then focuses on formulating the general framework for evaluating performance of regulatory enforcement bodies. Based on this framework, an evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of government inspection bodies in selected sectors is conducted with benchmarking to international examples, as far as comparative data permits.
The paper is based on both qualitative analytical methods (such as literature review and case study) and quantitative methods (such as sociological surveys and statistical research).
The results of the analysis suggest that evaluating performance of business inspections should include all steps for minimizing risks and losses in the controlled area – from prevention of violations (reducing risks) to ensuring the reimbursement, should the risk event happen. While a number of factors influence the outcomes of the inspection process (with government bodies being only one factor), a multi-layer performance framework including outcomes, intermediate results, and outputs should be used. Implementing such framework requires efforts on collecting the data independent from the authority which is subject to evaluation, however, the public sector innovations and the ICT use could help in meeting such data requirements. The performance framework should factor in the actual administrative costs associated with regulatory inspections, both on the business and on the budget side.