The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
VI. Public Policy Analysis Development
Author(s)  Omar Scharifi 
  Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Berlin  Germany
Bihler Tobias,  
 
 Title  European Union’s Twinning Instrument as a Means to Build Up Capacities of Public Administrations - A Stocktaking of Its Impact Evaluation
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Omar Scharifi
Abstract  
  
2018 is going to be the anniversary of 20 years of the EU Twinning Instrument as one key element of the European neighbourhood policy and the support for accession countries to adopt the Union Acquis. Such a long period of time provides good conditions for an assessment of outputs and outcomes to understand, if it meets the given objectives. The article shall provide a stocktaking of some existing key data of evaluations of outcomes and impact (e. g. Evaluation of the Institutional Twinning Instrument in the Countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy of European Union /HTSPE Limited in 2012). The article investigates in how far the instrumental framework conditions of the EU Twinning Instrument promote or hinder the achievement of reform outcomes (length of projects, long-term orientation of objectives etc.). Each project is the result of a negotiation between the beneficiary country with its governmental institutions and the European Union’s Delegation. In return for the EU’s financing of external administrative expertise, the EU partner country’s administration is supposed to contribute to the achievement of the agreed mandatory results. Problems in the sense of the principal-agent theory may occur, as the beneficiary may be interested in the provision of external expertise from a member state, but not in the output it committed itself to towards the EU delegation.
This research intends to list the main work that was done in evaluation of EU-Twinning, and describes, as part of this endeavor, the approach and the procedure that are applied by the EU COM to evaluate the instruments IPA and ENI as a whole and on the basis of their single projects. It lists potential shortcomings of its evaluation and its strengths. And lastly, it formulates on the basis of the findings of this investigation some challenges for evaluation and suggestions to respond to them.