The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
II. e-Government
Author(s)  Nicolae Urs 
  Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca  Romania
 
 
 Title  Is Communication Through Social Media Influenced By Election Campaigns? Case Study: Romanian Cities, National Elections
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Nicolae Urs
Abstract  
  
There is a general consensus among researchers that governments, both central and local are more and more interested in using social media tools to connect with citizens. As a consequence, they are investing more and more resources into it and so are becoming more and more adept at this type of communication.
Our interest in this research is to see if, in election time, their messages differ somehow from the usual pattern. This is interesting for us because, in Romania’s case, the local elected representatives are in most cases the best electoral agents of the political parties. The research is further aided by the fact that local elections happen before general elections (for example, this year the local election were in spring, the general election in autumn). A difference in the way social media tools are used in an election campaign time could show us how much local government’s official accounts are used as a part of the political parties’ election toolbox.
To achieve this we will analyze the official Facebook accounts of 6 cities in Romania, whose mayors are members of the most important Romanian political parties, both in election campaign period, as well as before and after.