The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
III. PA Reform
Author(s)  Ina Ramasheuskaya 
  IPU - Public Administration Research Centre
Misnk  Belarus
Rabava Natallia,  
 
 Title  What Governs those who Govern the State: Motivation of Belarusian Public Officials in Numbers
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Ina Ramasheuskaya
Abstract  
  
Building the quality public administration system is one of the key ways to increase the competitiveness of Belarusian economy. As indicated in the Strategic program for the sustainable development of Belarus till 2030, one of the challenges that need to be addressed in order to improve the effectiveness and quality of governance is to raise professionalism and prestige of civil service.
Without close attention to the issues of motivation among civil servants it is not possible to focus the public administration system on the implementation of new goals and tasks, including the interaction with civil society on a wide range on social and economic development issues. The paper addresses the issue of public officials’ motivation in Belarus. The results are derives from 301 questionnaires filed in by civil servants and employees of state organizations in Belarus.
Key words: civil service, motivation, Belarus.

Research results
Building a high-quality public administration system is one of the key factors required to increase the competitiveness of Belarusian national economy. As it is indicated in the draft of the Program for social and economic development of Belarus 2016-2020 , to improve the quality of economic management the government plans a few measures focused on increasing the quality of governmental operations. In particular, there will be measures to increase the prestige of public service, as well as the measures to introduce effective motivation mechanisms for civil servants (Sections 9 and 19). There are also plans to increase the range of opportunities for professional development of civil servants, including international experience exchange programs.
The objective of this research was to assess the effectiveness of existing motivation instruments that are currently employed in central and local governments as well as in public organizations in Belarus. This forms the first part of the questionnaire. We also supposed that the motivation of public officials is closely linked to their understanding of goals and objectives of their organizations, was well as their understanding of their own work objectives and priorities, therefore we put these questions in the second part of our questionnaire. The third part included questions about whether salaries in their organizations are linked to performance, and also how often and who evaluates performances in their organizations. The fourth block of questions focused on opportunities for professional development in their organizations, and who is in charge of employees’ professional development decisions.
The questionnaire was returned by 301 individuals, among which 15% indicated that they work in central government, 48% - in local government and 37% - in various governmental organizations located in Minsk, regional and district centers.
Among three top motivation instruments used in the organizations where respondents work were: financial instruments (bonuses, monetary awards etc.), professional development opportunities and various non-financial rewards (thank-you letters from top managers, certificates of being a “best employee” over a year etc.). Financial rewards are most often employed in central government bodies and governmental organizations, while in local government organizations the most frequently used motivation instruments is offering the opportunities for professional development.