The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
III. PA Reform
Author(s)  Gulimzhan Suleimenova 
  The Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Astana   Kazakhstan
Nurbek Kabizhan, Ministry of Investment and Development of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan, Evgeniy Kapoguzov, Omsk State University, Omsk, Russia, Margarita Kadyrova, Academy of Public Administration under the President of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan 
 
 Title  Performance Evaluation System of Government Agencies in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Modern Conditions and Prospects of Development
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Gulimzhan Suleimenova
Abstract  
  
The strategic goal of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2050 is to create a welfare society based on a strong state, advanced economy and possibilities of universal labor. Building a strong state amid rapidly changing historical conditions, in turn, requires increased responsibility, efficiency and functionality of the government.
Problems of increasing the efficiency of the government have been the subject of discussion in Kazakhstan since the 2000s. In 2005, the World Bank gave Kazakhstan a number of recommendations for the implementation of the performance evaluation of the government agencies, their departments and civil servants. However, the system of performance evaluation of government agencies, allowing to obtain comprehensive information about the government agency, was only introduced in 2010. This process was preceded by the comprehensive training.
In general, the implementation of assessment system in Kazakhstan helped to reduce the proportion of inefficient public agencies, improve the quality of strategic planning in government, expand the use of information technology, raise the performance discipline and the quality of public services, improve budget execution. Consequently, the government has formed an assessment institution that has such a positive effect as an increased efficiency of government agencies.
However, an analysis of the impact of informal institutions (organizational culture) on the performance of government agencies, as well as how the implementation of the evaluation system affected the changes in the organizational culture and organizational behavior in public agencies, as well as justification of methodological approaches to its analysis, still remains a largely unexplored area for Kazakhstan.
In paper we will present some results of studying the process of institutionalization of the performance evaluation system of government agencies, as well as the impact of organizational culture and organizational behavior on its effectiveness. In 2016 we analyzied organizational structure of assessment, the role and responsibility of assessment departments, and analyzied assessment methodologies in seven areas and their changes by years. as a result identified the advantages and disadvantages of the current system of performance assessment of government agencies.