The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
General Session
Author(s)  Viktor Sapryka 
  Belgorod State University
Belgorod  Russian Federation
Zvyeryeva Olga, Denys Tkachov, Kharkоv, Ukraine, tkachov.denys@gmail.com  
 
 Title  Transforming Public Administration in Turbulent Times: the Case Study of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Viktor Sapryka
Abstract  
  
The processes of independent state building after the disintegration of the USSR have predetermined the tracks of development of public administration systems in the new states. We are going to present the results of the success analysis of public administration reforms in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine – the states that have been the core of the Soviet Union.
For a long time, these states lived in the common socio-cultural, legal and economic system, which, on the one hand, has resulted in similar problems in the process of public administration reformation, and on the other hand, crystallized the peculiarities of public administration evolution that could be extrapolated to the whole post-Soviet space.
In the geopolitical reality for these states, the interstate border was close to non-existent for centuries (in the Russian Empire and the USSR); it was an extremely light administrative and consequently economic barrier. It had no cultural significance due to the ethnic diffusion of Russian and Ukrainian populations across the border and the shared axiological system. The political aspect of the border was also insignificant because border regions belonged to the same, though proclaimed as federative, state.
Such problems and peculiarities shape not only the state reforms, but also the development of the whole civil society.
Another factor that determines the transformation of the public administration systems, is cooperation of its agencies between themselves and with foreign partners. Before 2013, the public administration reforms in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus had had similar vectors determined by bilateral Treaties of Amity and Cooperation. However, after 2013 Ukraine has been struggling to move to a public administration system inspired by the one adopted in the EU.
The objectives of our research include a comparative analysis of public administration systems in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, analysis of effectiveness of the administrative reforms, and drawing scenarios of social space development in these states.