The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IX. Transition, Change and Uncertainty
Author(s)  Gyorgyi Nyikos 
  Ludovika University of Public Service
Budapest  Hungary
Kondor Zsuzsanna,  
 
 Title  The Hungarian Experiences with Handling Irregularities in the Use of EU Funds
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Gyorgyi Nyikos
Abstract  
  
Using funds from the European Union involves a complex process and Member State authorities must comply with a wide range EU and domestic pieces of legislation. Non-compliance with such rules can lead to irregularities being found both by the competent bodies in the Member State and by the European Commission. Besides compliance with the letter of the law, it is also important to take into account the EU budgetary principles, especially the principle of sound financial management.
The principal focus of the paper is the institutional system dealing with irregularities in Hungary and the relevant legal procedures, both in the past and at present. It is looked at how the institutions and procedures have evolved since the country joined the EU, how effective the system has been, how well it detected and dealt with irregularities. The range of irregularities found in Hungary since joining the EU and the dealing with them is also discussed. Furthermore the research also aims to investigate how irregularities are dealt with at EU level and the uncertainties caused by the issues detected during EU audits.
The research is largely based on the relevant past and present legislation and publicly available reports and data, although the authors’ invaluable experience in the field of EU Cohesion Policy also provides a firm basis for the contents of the paper. During the analysis special attention is given to the uncertainties for the institutions implementing EU Cohesion Policy and commentary is provided by the authors on how the relevant issues might be effectively dealt with.
It is expected to the found that the Hungarian institutional system has not been very effective to detect irregularities at the start, although some improvement has been made during the country’s EU membership. However there are still several legal uncertainties and confusions in the system. Stronger controls, such as in the area of public procurement have led to slightly less irregularities being found at EU level, although this result in an increase of administrative burden.