The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
III. PA Reform
Author(s)  Rustamjon Urinboyev 
  Lund University
Lund  Sweden
 
 
 Title  Migration Governance and Shadow Economy in Russia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Rustamjon Urinboyev
Abstract  
  
I am currently working on a book project on migrant illegality and informal integration strategies in Russia (contract signed with the University of California Press). I probe into the ways the migrants maneuver their life in the Russian legal system and among the police, immigration officials and border guards, and how they employ informal order-producing structures.

During the NISPAcee PA Reform session, I would like to present one of the chapters of my book that deals with the interconnections of migration governance, shadow economy and immigrant legal integration. My paper presentation consists of two parts. The first section discusses the role and functions of the three Russian state actors, namely police officers, migration police and border guards with regard to the immigration control laws and policies. The purpose is to examine how these three state actors regulate and enforce immigration and labour laws. The second section presents the results of observations, informal interviews and focus group interviews with migrant workers where the emphasis is placed on migrants’ daily interactions with police officers, migration service officials and border guards under the conditions of a shadow economy.

I argue that Russian policies of immigration control have further pushed migrants into the shadow economy rather than reducing the incentives for informal employment. This is due to the vested interests of relevant Russian state actors (e.g. police, immigration officials, border guards), where each of these actors view shadow economy as a source of ‘kormushka‘ (feeding-trough) and try to ‘take their own piece‘ from it. These patterns can be gleaned by attending to migrant workers’ everyday experiences, tactics and coping strategies when they try to negotiate the ‘rules of the game’ with Russian migration officials, police officers and border guards. Although the processes and strategies mentioned above may seem as manifestation of corruption and unrule of law, they actually constitute a real mode of migration governance and thereby reveal the broader socio-legal context in which migrants’ socio-legal integration takes place.