The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
VI. Public Policy Analysis Development
Author(s)  Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru (Cruceanu) 
  National School of Political Studies and Public Administration
Bucharest  Romania
 
 
 Title  Linking Policy Capacity and Policy Convergence in Comparative Studies
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru (Cruceanu)
Abstract  
  
In the context of comparative studies and policy convergence, policy capacity is crucial for more practical aspects of policy analysis. Although the European administrative space is sometimes thought as a tool which supports policy convergence, it can provide a framework for discussing policy capacity. Nowadays, it is known that there is an extensive scholarly literature acknowledged the problematic nature of policy capacity in the modern states, and also a contradictory debate, based on the one hand on the preference for a minimal role of state, and on the other hand on the reaffirmation of the state and convergence of the public policy. However, the increasing complexity of many contemporary policy problems coupled with rising expectations of the public present unprecedented challenges to the capacity of governments to make and implement effective policies. Thus, both practitioners and scholars raised the question on government capabilities for policymaking in turbulent times.
There is a considerable number of works which offer definitions of capacity, broadly or in narrow sense, but in the same time, there are many disagreements about the detailed conceptual and definitional aspects of the subject. The subject become even controversial when in discussion come the indicators to measure it in the context of policy convergence issue.
In this paper, I start from the rational choice analysis buildings blocks of policy capacity for discussing the interdependent relationship between policy capacity and policy convergence. To this aim, I analysis the policy capacity and introduce democracy as a new criteria for modelling the indicators for measuring the policy capacity. Thus, after a brief introduction is made a short literature review underlying the latest results related to policy capacity and convergence assessment. The methodological part consists in the presentation of several indicators used in measuring the policy capacity. The end of this work is represented by an attempt to build a composite indicator for policy capacity.