The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  21st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
PA Reform
Author(s)  Grazyna Bukowska 
  University of Warsaw
Warsaw  Poland
 
 
 Title  Quality of public administration and human capital
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Grazyna Bukowska
Abstract  
  
There are two reasons for bad government in transition countries political economy and productivity. The political economy arguments hold that governments are less accountable because citizens have few opportunities to exercise their voice. As countries become richer and more educated, government responsiveness to citizen needs and hence its quality improves, in part because politics become more democratic and transparent (Papaioannou and Siourounis 2008).
An alternative view of bad government in developing countries holds that low productivity of
government services is explained by inputs, including human and physical capital as well as technology. Low government productivity can show up in a number of outcomes: public worker absenteeism, corruption and bureaucratic delays or just low quality of public goods.

In this paper, I ask if the quality of administration improves with education and development in transition societies and why this happened? I also test empirically an explanation of improvement in the quality of civil service by the process of recruitment civil service based on merits, where higher values indicate a more professionalized public administration. I use evidence from cross-national public opinion data (World Survey Value, Worldwide Governance Indicators) to analyze the post-communist countries.