The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  21st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Civil Service
Author(s)  Aser Nica 
  National School of Political Studies and Public Administration
Bucharest  Romania
 
 
 Title  The role of leadership in public sector from Romania and Great Britain. Comparative study.
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Aser Nica
Abstract  
  
Abstract. It has been argued that the West with its well-established democracies was largely responsible for the filling of the institutional vacuum the East experienced after the fall of totalitarian regimes in the eve of the 90s. Scholars of international relations and public policies loudly debated on the existent causality between the European enlargement and the administrative reforms that Central and Eastern European countries experienced during the last two decades.
The subject of leadership represents one of the most significant items on the agendas of private and public sector organizations in both the developed and developing worlds. On a regular basis, this is caused by the challenges that organizations are facing in all sectors of constantly changing environments.
In this article our intention is to research the role and development of leadership within the Romanian and British public administration both at present and in the future. Generally, Romania and Great Britain have noticed that there is a great discrepancy between how the public sector is perceived nowadays and how the national interest should be seen now or in the future. Romanian society, however, becomes more diverse and the public institutions are thus more flexible.
The new situations require new types of organizers. The leaders involved in the public institutions can help the spread, the promotion and the maintenance of the new values that are necessary for a successful reform of the public sector. Even if there have been some attempts in these fields, Romania has not yet developed a systematic strategy of building-up the leadership as part of the reform process. In contrast to this situation, industrialized countries have already begun to elaborate such a strategy, and Great Britain is already using it.
The research methodology is based on an empirical analysis. Thus, in order to be able to reach relevant conclusions I will apply in my analysis both qualitative and quantitative research methods. A theoretical part is followed by a legal framework and supported in the end by comparative study examples.