The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  21st NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Internationalization and Networking of PA Studies
Author(s)  Alexey Barabashev 
  Higher School of Economics
Moscow  Russian Federation
 
 
 Title  Civil servants training in the US: Example of the open model training system
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Alexey Barabashev
Abstract  
  
Open model for civil servants training propose some theoretical principles, extracted from the theory of human capital, the theory of social professional filters, and from the theory of continuous professional education. Input components from the theory of human capital is:
• Development of the individual professional competencies is not separate from the motivation of individual;
• It is not correct to develop the professional competencies just for fixed position. Instead, education should be oriented for professional growth, for discovering of new creative capacities, for long-lasting carrier of individual. It is, namely, the development of human capital, not limited by peculiar skills or applied knowledge training;
• Individuals have the right to select educational programs from the open market according to their needs.
Theory of social professional filters adds to the list some additional principal requirements:
• Professional competencies should be correlated with specific job position of civil servant;
• Professional education should be not only knowledge-oriented, but mainly practical-oriented on effective implementation of job duties;
• Promotion on next positions should be based on merit, but not on other capacities and motivation level.
The principles of continuous professional education theory mostly based on human capital theory, and just concentrated on the necessity to provide the education for civil servants not occasionally, but regularly, according to the needs of servants and government bodies.
At the paper I would like to concentrate on 3 levels of civil servants training in the US:
Types of the educational training programs (different subject orientation of the programs);
Structure of the educational programs (duration, educational methods and technologies, relation of the programs, what kind of organizations could execute the programs);
System of training process governance (division of the responsibility: government bodies, universities, associations, other organizations, plus evaluation of the programs quality);
Programs financing (individual vouchers, tenders, direct financing, etc).
All the levels of civil servants training system in the US I will try to evaluate from the prospects of its correlation with the Open Model principles, and to prove that, with some peculiarities, the US training for civil servants system fits for Open Model principles.