The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  20th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Civil Service
Author(s)  Tudor Cristian Ticlau 
  Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca  Romania
Balica Dan, Cristina Mora 
 
 Title  Transformational leadership in local public administration. A study regarding leadership types in decentralized local institutions in Romania
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Tudor Cristian Ticlau
Abstract  
  
Transformational leadership received a lot of attention from both researchers and academics, since James MacGregor Burns introduced the concept in 1975 and later Bernard M. Bass proved that it can be measured (1985). There is some evidence showing that such a leadership style is one of the most desired (Den Hartog, House, Hanges, Ruiz-Quintanilla, & Dorfman, 1999) and also one of the most effective (Bass, 1997, Bass & Riggio, 2006)
Transformational leadership theory has also played an important part in the effort to create an integrative theory of leadership. In its simples form, transformational leadership is a process that changes and transforms individuals (Northouse, 2001). Thus, one approach on viewing leaders is as agents of change and growth. Although there are numerous studies regarding transformational leadership or change process in the public sector in western countries (Wright, Pandey, 2010, Moynihan, Pandey, Wright, 2009,Kenmore 2009, Cooper, 2005), the issue of leadership in the Romanian public sector has not been subjects of research, especially from the perspective of leaders as agents of change. Romania has evolved from an authoritarian regime before 1989 to a democratic state, member of the European Union in a period of almost 20 years. Although after 1989, there was much talk about administrative reform especially from political parties, the reform itself was rather slow, ambiguous, without vision and mostly incremental, especially in the first years after the revolution (Mora, Ţiclău, 2008). The EU accession process has been a strong catalyst for change but main changes have been mostly on the legal framework and structure of the administration. Although the 2004 reform strategy had a component of civil service reform, this did not include specific leadership components.
The present study is keen to analyze the leadership component in the local public administration using transformational leadership as the main theoretical construct. The study uses the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (Bass, 1985) in order to assess the type of leadership found in decentralized local public institutions, more exactly town halls and county councils and deconcentrated public institutions, more specifically prefectures. We aim to see the degree in which transformational leadership is present at local level and whether there are significant differences in organizational results according to leadership style. The originality of the study comes from the fact that it is the first study that uses the MLQ in local public administration in Romania.