The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  20th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
PA Reform
Author(s)  Mladen Karadzoski 
  University "St. Kliment Ohridski"
Bitola  Republic of North Macedonia
 
 
 Title  TWINNING programs as an adequate model for reforming and recomposing of the public administrations in the candidate and potential candidate countries for entrance into the European Union
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Mladen Karadzoski
Abstract  
  
Abstract:

One of the main strategic priorities of the candidate and potential candidate countries is the membership in the European Union. But, on this road, there are a lot of standards and criteria which should be fulfilled by Iceland, Turkey, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia before they join the Union.
Some of the fundamental criteria for accession of the candidate and potential candidate countries in the European Union are connected with the appropriate reforms of their public administrations. One part of the so-called Madrid criteria is related to the functionality of the public administrations of these countries. Each of the candidate and potential candidate countries should respect the principles of the European administrative space, (EAS) i.e. to have effective, efficient, responsive, service-oriented, competent and responsible public administration. That is a basic precondition for a successful integration of the candidate and potential candidate countries towards the European Union.
Although there are not unified standards and criteria related to the organization and functioning of the public administrations in each of the EU countries, but also in the candidate and potential candidate countries, still, the above mentioned principles of the EAS should be part of the every day work of the public administrations in each of these countries. TWINNING is an instrument which enables experts from the EU countries to work together with the competent public servants from the candidate and potential candidate countries, so together they can contribute for the improvement of the capacities of the public administration in each of these countries.
For these reasons, the main goal of this paper will be to analyze the form and the content of the Twinning programs, and to explain their role in the processes of reforming and recomposing the different areas of public administrations in each of the candidate and potential candidate EU countries.
The most frequent methods which will be used in this paper are the descriptive, analytical, and comparative method, because of the character of the paper.
The main results which should come out of this paper are detection of the irregularities in the application of the Twinning programs in each of the candidate and potential candidate countries for EU membership, and suggesting an appropriate model for better implementation of the Twinning programs in each of the countries-beneficiaries of these programs.