The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  19th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
PA Reform
Author(s)  Zaira Jagudina 
  University of Skovde
Skovde  Sweden
 
 
 Title  Restructuring the state - civil society interaction in Russia: The case study of the socially - oriented NGOs
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
This paper presents the results of a pilot study on the organisational identity and emotional regime produced and enacted in the nonprofit NGOs contracted as delivers of social service by local governments in European Russia.
Since the late 1990s a set of reforms aimed at restructuring the interaction between local governments and civil society organisations has been carried out in Russia (Weigle, 2000; Yakimets, 2004). Among other reforms, NGOs providing charitable assistance were involved by local governments as contractors in the delivery of social services. During the transition new social services were introduced by local governments to address such problems as the care of disabled children, victims of domestic violence, and the drug business, and others. While NGOs pioneered many of these services, local governments often created agencies to expand the scale of delivery (Struyk, 2003). The government-civil society relations during the transition were characterised both by tension, conflicts and efforts to establish a dialogue and partnership (Jagudina, 2009). The historical background sheds light on the present institutional and social-emotional contexts in which the NGOs are involved for providing civil services.
The practices of the nonprofits can be analysed as including at least three different kinds of social interactions: cooperating with local government, recruiting/giving service to clients, and maintaining ties with the other national/international NGOs. Organisational identity of the NGO members is produced and enacted through routine practices (interactional rituals) and emotional labour exerted during these interactions. This study is focused on the organisational identity of NGOs staff members. The questions investigated are: How do the nonprofits make sense of their interaction with local government? How do they view their position in the public sector in relation to the service-users? Are they positioned as professional civil servants or grassroots activists, or both?
This pilot study is based on the empirical materials collected with help of document studies, semi-structural qualitative interviews with the NGOs’ directors and staff members, and participant observation of their work practices. The organisations in the study are located in Moscow and St Petersburg; they differ in size and provided social services.