The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
VII. Working Group on Policy Analysis
Author(s)  Zdravko Petak 
  University of Zagreb
Zagreb  Croatia
Petek Ana, Ana Petek 
 
 Title  The role of policy analysis in the work of policy bureaucracy in Croatia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
In what way are the mentioned dimensions of the process of policy-making generally implemented in Croatia? Is there a systematic evaluation of policy options as a phase anticipating the political decision by which a policy is legitimized? Respectively, is an evaluation conducted of the options connected to a policy, for the sake of better informing of the public. In the same way, does any body in the structures of the executive or legislative authorities deal with the policies that are being conducted in Croatia? Those are the fundamental questions to which clear answers should be given in order to get a clear picture of the way in which public policy is formed and conducted in Croatia.

There is a number of specificities to the process of creating policy in Croatia, if we compare it to the usual process of policy-making in the western democracies (Petak, 2006a). The absence of conventional policy procedures is not linked just to the phase of policy evaluation. The problem goes far deeper and extends to the entire policy process. The absence of quite specific procedures is visible also in the initial phases of policy making – the placing of specific policies onto the agenda and the formulating of the possibilities for these policies. One could say, moreover, that the creation of public policy in Croatia isn’t actually based upon policy analysis as a system of decision-making in the public sector. If we begin with the standard distiguishing of policy profession, unlike other professions that can be the basis for decision-making in the public sector, we can easily say that by us is much more significant for instance the influence of the classical planning or the tradition of classical public administration than policy analysis.

The policy analysis is only just acquiring the right to exist in our system of public administration. Given the fact that specialized units for recording, monitoring and evaluation of policy are just in the making, we can actually only say that policy analysis in Croatia has the opportunity of becoming an indispensable tool of the public administration. It’s important to emphasize the latter, because it‘s a fact that the embrya of policy analysis as a systematic approach in the evaluation of programmes already exist in some projects connected to the private sector, non-governmental organisation and international organisations that operate in Croatia, but that it hasn’t become the basis for decision-making in the public sector, in the departments of the government and state agencies.