The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
II. Working Group on e-Government
Author(s)  Dace Aizstrauta 
  University of Latvia
Riga  Latvia
 
 
 Title  Revealing the concept of knowledge management in public administration and e-government policy in Latvia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
An increasing number of organisations understand that information and knowledge is their most important resource, unfortunately it stays as a passive property if the organizations do not engage in the management of this valuable resource. Public administration institutions create and work with immense amount of information every day, big part of this knowledge) is embedded in the bureaucracy and civil servants, so the need to manage the knowledge in an effective way is an important task for public administration. Although elements of knowledge management can be found in almost every public administration, careful management of information and knowledge, i.e. the creation, sharing and application of knowledge, in an effective way is crucial especially during the crisis when many public administrators lose their positions, agencies are being restructured, united or liquidated, as it is done in Latvia.
The technical basis for managing knowledge relies upon appropriate technological infrastructure, applications for knowledge transfer, data bases to manage the change effectively, etc. But although information technology plays an important role in knowledge management systems, there also has to be a clear policy, understanding and involvement of civil service to reach effective knowledge management system. Therefore this paper analyses the policy planning documents in the field of development of public administration, civil service and e-government in Latvia from knowledge management perspective. An approach that combines three knowledge management dimensions with three phases allows categorizing all tasks of the policy planning documents and evaluates their distribution among these dimensions and phases - to what extent do the policy planning documents in the field of development of public administration, civil service and e-government development correspond to knowledge management framework?
The central conclusion is that the policy planning documents are aimed mainly at creation of knowledge in the process dimension. The tendency is similar in all three analysed documents despite the differences of context they have been elaborated in. The article raises questions about the validation of such knowledge, the role of IT systems and the need for an analytical framework for evaluation of policies from knowledge management perspective.
The paper outlines a wider study of knowledge management in public administration in Latvia and further empirical analysis and exploration of the existing elements of knowledge management systems in public administration.