The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on PA Reform
Author(s)  Galima Eshmukhamedova 
  I do not belong to any Institution
Moscow  Russian Federation
 
 
 Title  Administrative - territorial reforms in the Kyrgyz Republic
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
The article is devoted to Public Administration reforms leading to democratic rights in the Kyrgyz Republic. The democratic principles fully depend on the scale of the development of civil society. Based on the analyses and research the following conclusions can be done:
- The administrative-territorial reforms are ongoing in the Kyrgyz Republic;
- the administrative changes are implemented;
- transfer from four level to three level system;
- overlapping of tasks and functions take place;
- lack of qualified specialists on a primary level;
The necessity of administrative-territorial reforms is evident. But it is not a short-term activity. It should be done stage by stage and very carefully. The main tasks of them are:
- establishing administrative-territorial tools responding to the tasks of a democratic society.
- decentralization and clear division of functions, authorities, finance between state administration and local self-governments.
- Increasing the role of the primary level.
Some positive results were made during that time. The system of two level budget was implemented. Aiyl Okmotu money is not redistributed by the rayon. It stays in local self-governments. The income increased two times in 2007. And the people know better how to spend it, what the priorities are. E.g in the village Maevka the money was spent to improve the infrastructure: there was no water, in some places there was no electricity, the roads were in a very bad condition. The Aiyl Okmotu spent the money for those purposes. And the people see the positive results. The local budget increased to 113%.
But the problems on the primary level is the lack of qualified specialists. The salary of officials was quite low and people moved to towns.
In 2008 the President approved the law "On Elimination of Administrative-territorial Units located on the territories of the republican and oblast significance towns”. Based on the law it was supposed to make larger the territories, to join some rayon and aiyl okmotus. It was supposed to reduce the number of rayons from 40 to 25-27, aiyl okmotu – from 472 to 300-320. It was supposed to reduce the number of oblast structures to 4-7 times. As the result in 2008 more than 120 oblast structures and 13 aiyl okmotu were reduced. The number of oblast structures reduced from 260 to 136 and the number of authorities reduced from 6120 to 4343. As for primary level the number of aiyl okmotu reduced from 472 t0 459 and the number of authorities reduced to 180 people and now they are 8107.
The second stage of the reform started in 2009 and finishes in 2010. In September 2009 the president of the KR Mr. Bakiev criticized authorities and mentioned about large-scale reforms. Some measures were done in this part. The positions of a state secretary and president’s advisers were reduced. The tasks and functions of the President’s administration will be transferred to the government. In reality they overlap functions and tasks. Decision making process is too long and people sometimes wait for solving their problems years. The state servants should be professional and they should serve the people. A lot of authorities have old approach to their tasks and functions that came from the soviet era. The KR needs authorities with modern and professional mentality oriented to building democratic society.
To attract qualified authorities and increase their interest in work the President increased their salaries from 50 to 270%. A year ago it was 1 300 soms and nowadays it is 3 300 soms. The civil servants had to prove their qualifications. 4412 civil servants were attested by 2008. 4 % didn’t prove their qualifications and were not attested. But more often attestation is formal.
Thus we see that some activities were done in administrative sphere but not in territorial.
The third stage will start in 2010 and finishes in 2012. It is supposed to change the four level system to three level system.