The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on PA Reform
Author(s)  Marius Profiroiu 
  Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Bucharest  Romania
Profiroiu Alina, Tudorel Andrei, Ph.D. Professor, Faculty of Cybernetics, Statistics and Economic Computation, Statistics and Econometrics Department, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Alina Profiroiu, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Management , Administration and Public Management Department, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Marius Profiroiu, Ph.D. Professor, Faculty of Management , Administration and Public Management Department, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania  
 
 Title  Romanian public administration pay system reform - a major factor in the modernization process
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Problem Statement
For any modern state, applying of a personnel pay system is an important factor that stimulates the provision of quality services and optimizing its operational costs. This requirement is even more important in a period when, between private and public sectors is a fierce competition in recruitment of staff in terms of professional performance. The process of integration of Romania into the European Union recommended a reposition of the state structures to the requirements of this process. An important aspect of the modernization of the state could be played by the pay system in the public sector. In fact, developing and implementing a new pay system in the public administration has been a concern of the decision makers, since 2004. The Strategy of Public Administration Reform, approved in that year, set amongst priority measures "to create and implement a uniform pay system of civil service”. Unfortunately, adopting a new pay system in the entire public sector was achieved only in 2009.
The study aims to emphasis a number of issues related to implementing the new law on public administration. We want to highlight some of these issues: macroeconomic considerations that have motivated this decision; medium and long term perspectives of implementation of the new law, identify possible imbalances related to personnel policy in the field of local and central public administration, comparing the sector public administration with other sectors of state, etc.


Methods
To substantiate the conclusions, data series of official statistics published by the National Institute of Statistics are investigated using statistical methods. Equally, will be used information from the application of a statistical survey to a sample of civil servants from public administration, to measure their opinion on important issues related to changes in public administration: civil service reform, decentralization, transparency, etc.


Conclusions and Recommendations
Implementation of a new pay system in public administration was inevitable, from several reasons: the current system is not motivating; the expectations created by implementing of the strategy of reform in 2004 recommended such a measure; in the current period is recommended a drastic reduction public sector wage costs from about 9% of GDP to about 6% in the next period, etc.
For taking effective decisions in personnel policy in public administration it is recommended to create an appropriate statistical tool at the level of National Agency of Civil Servants and National Statistics Institute, instrument that will allow the collection of statistical data for undertaking periodic studies on the characteristics of the pay system in the civil service.